Chapter Two – Arthur!

Now, in the times preceding King Arthur, the Romans had given up on finding the Holy Grail and had withdrawn from the British Isles.  They gave no leadership in transition; they simply left.  The people had great trial and tribulation after being subjected to the law and order of the Romans and having it suddenly removed and left in the hands of whose who had capitulated to ehir side and learned so many of their ways.  With their overlords gone, they began fighting among themselves as to who should have the supreme position of domination and rule the land.

 

Merlin was a Spirit polarized heart person who did not see himself as welcome in the purple Jesus scenario and had been hiding out on the Isle, know known as Avalon, where he had temple involvement but had not let himself become involved in the sexuality going on there.

 

The Druids had taken him in because of this, but he was not a Druid.  He saw what was happening when the Romans pulled out and watched with angst as pieces of the parental rage fragmentation fought about who was going to have the dominant role in governing the people then.  He did not know what he was seeing there in these terms, but he was watching most of the major pieces who wanted to claim the parental position of the Father of Manifestation fight amongst themselves for that position, as though it was not something that was already decided by who actually had that position and as though he did not share this imprinting.

 

Merlin had his own rage at the parental pieces and did on let on he had this rage, himself.  He wanted to be reasonable, appeal to them from the wisdom he felt he had there and guide the situation the way he wanted it to go, which was to put people in their right place and have the Father of Manifestation rule with the other pieces as subordinate and supporting lords of their own areas.  Without his own rage in motion there, Merlin could not understand the depth or intensity of this rage or see that it was not prepared to be reasonable; expcially not reasonable according to heart.

 

Merlin then decided he needed to invoke some greater power they would listen to and began to present his teachings as surrounded and supported by signs and omens, mystical teachings and prophecies and anything else he thought would help support the position he wanted others to take there, including magic.  Merlin was already a mysterious person of undetermined origin and age, and he decided it would be helpful to enhance his reputation there.

 

When he wanted to give an understanding that required reincarnational memory that others didn’t have there, he simply said he was alive then, and told them what he wanted them to know about it.  When something didn’t sound quite right to others acoording to the point of view they wanted to have, he would point to the heavens and say it was right there to be read by those who could and start giving them lessons about the stars they did not really want to have until they said, “Alright, I’ll take your word for it.”

 

Merlin was determined to have the Father of Manifestation born ccording to plans similar to those that had been made for Jesus, including the right bloodlines to be able to take the throne away from his competitors.  He had already heard the story of Jesus and felt that he knew from some place deep inside himself what had gone wrong there.  He wanted to avoid that this time by moving along with his own point of view.

 

Merlin did not mind engineering Arthur’s parentage in many ways, including getting Igraine to go places where Uther would see her, because he felt that having the right bloodlines was only an earthly matter, when really, it was raising the Father of Manifestation to have more softness and openness toward Heart that was going to make the difference.  He wanted the Father of Manifestation to be taught by Heart, in other words, namely, him.

 

Merlin had already succeeded in getting Arthur born by the time people began coming to him and asking him for any kind of solution, help, or advice he could give to all the fighting.  He told them all that if they would wait a little while, he thought he could produce an heir to the throne that would satisfy them all.  This way, they did not know his age or where they were going to find him.

 

It was Igraine who had given birth to Arthur and had given him up, both to protect him and because she had a rancor toward the child, Arthur, which she often spoke of to her older child who was Morgaine, a daughter who was not very favorably looked upon by the father who had taken her father’s place.  Morgaine had a growing rancor toward him for that, and not being able to do anything about it with him, resolved to take it out on his son, whose whereabouts Uther did not know.  The more he longed for his own son and gave little or no attention to Morgaine, the more she resolved to do it that way.

 

Igraine and Merlin had an old relationship together with the Celtic-Druid people.  She trusted Merlin that he knew best what needed to happen there, and so gave him Arthur willingly, but she did not really like his plan and hated him, too, for giving Uther her husband’s appearance that night without telling her what he was going to do.  Women had plenty of power in Igraine’s experience as a temple descendent, and she did not see why her daughter should not be given the throne she had hoped was going to be won for their family if MOrgaine was simply adopted by her new husband and declared his rightful heir.

 

Igraine gave the outward appearance of staying out of politics, but she was very much tuned in to the goings on and had her own opinions about how she wanted it to go there.  Where she disagreed with Merlin, she had rage at him, but it did not move as rage, and Morgaine took her mother’s rage upon herself and wanted to avenge it, also.  Igraine did not speak to her daughter about the deception the night of Arthur’s conception, but her daughter had beein in the room, and the child had seen.

 

Morgaine had indigo involvement, displaced from her mother’s purple, and she had seen this man was not her father.  She could not let her mother know because she could not talk yet but she also did not want to let her mother know because she did not see how this could have helped her mother anyway, since he was so urgent and aggressive with his rage driven sex, as if he was taking revenge against Igraine’s husband this way.  She hated Uther for taking her father’s place.  All of these things formed in her as unspoken impressions since she did not speak yet.

  

She did not speak for a long time after that, either, until her mother thought she had been traumatized there, but Morgaine preferred to hold her observations as impressions she allowed to form as pictures in her mind.  She was forming her own rage agenda there that even involved taking over her mother’s position if she got the chance, because she saw her mother as not strong enough there, especially when she allowed this man to move in and lord it over her that she was not his daughter.  Uther wanted to find Arthur, but he knew he had to let Merlin keep him safe.  He did not live long enough to see Arthur become king, and Morgaine had an unseen hand in that.

 

Merlin had gone to Arthur many times to educate him in the ways he wanted him educated where he was growing up in secret, but it had not gone as well as he had hoped.  They had many disagreements until Merlin was not even sure he wanted Arthur on the throne when the day finally came, but he wanted to finish what he had started and was determined to see it through as best he could.  The more he butted heads with Arthur, the more he was not sure if he could make any difference with him.  They never tried direct emotional movement, though, only reasoning; and there, imprinted point of view was in a stand off against imprinted point of view, no matter how much of a relationship they had in other parts of themselves.

  

As most people already know, Arthur had no idea who he really was, until his day came and Merlin suddenly revealed that he was claimant to the throne of the king who should rule all of the other fighting lords.  Arthur was overwhelmed by how many fighting, and powerful looking, lords there were.  He had felt like a man, but now he suddenly felt like a boy there in their presence and not a boy who was very well respected or welcomed.  He saw himself through their eyes and feared they were right.  He looked too weak, was only a boy and was illegitimate by birth, he now found out, which was a shock to him.  He hadn’t even known his own parents were not his real parents until that moment when Merlin announced his claim to the lords who were gathered in London there, and suddenly, all around him, people were arguing about when the marriage between his parents had taken place and the other circumstances of his birth that he had never known before.

  

Merlin really was not a mother and did not know how this was going to affect Arthur there.  He wanted to raise him to be more open of heart and then delivered a blow to his heart like that in public, where Arthur already felt that any display of emotion about it would only make him look even more weak and unprepared in their eyes.

 

Arthur could hardly handle the situation, and tears were having to be fought back, because he wasn’t even sure he wanted to be a king, and least of all, a king who had to fight for his kingdom.  He was dependent upon Merliln for his claim, his identity and as his only ally there, since his own “father and brother” were now even seeming jealous.  Merlin, who he was at odds with so much of the time, had done this to him and had not even let him know!  Arthur could hardly get over it!

 

Arthur was not sure how he was going to fight all of these powerful looking lords to gain the throne Merlin was talking to everyone about there, but Arthur was hardly concerned about it.  He was thinking about the family he had lived with all these years and what that meant now, but Merlin did not let him stay there for long.  He urged Arthur to stand up and give a speech.

 

Arthur hardly knew what to say and only mumbled something about hoping he could be a good king.  The crowd was stunned to think that now they had a boy as heir to the throne, but Merlin was not moved by any of this and kept insisting he was the correct heir to the throne.

 

There was quite an argument, and even some fighting, right there in London as to whether Arthur should be given the throne, but Merlin presided over it and Arthur was given the opportunity Merlin wanted to have there to prove that people in their right places could make things happen the way they needed to happen.

 

Arthur found, though, that many of those who opposed him would not come to the council meetings he said he was going to have.  They preferred to have his decrees sent to them, so they could misinterpret them according to their own designs and claim they didn’t know they had misinterpreted them.  Arthur became exasperated with them and gave the places at his council meetings to heart pieces instead, who became his Knights of the Round Table, but Merlin would not sit there.

 

Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table had to go out and subdue the land, because there continued to be a lot of fighting going on, but Arthur was gaining some allies and some allegiance, and his knights were able to stop many things the people did not like to have happening to them.  Many of the lords stopped opposing openly, as though they were tired of fighting, but Arthur knew this was not a real allegiance and thought they were just becoming more secretive about their opposition.  He was becoming a very popular king with those who were experiencing the benefits of his rule, but feeling that so much was still being hidden from him by the opposing lords, Arthur was not sure how to hold onto his throne.

 

Arthur still had not married and wanted to marry for love, but Merlin suggested he also try to make that be someone who would strengthen his position and his claim to the throne even more.  Merlin had someone in mind, who was the daughter of an opposing lord.  He thought this would help a lot because he could see this lord would be more helpful if he had some position there that was more than he already had, but Arthur did not like this daughter as much as he liked Guinevere and told Merlin he did not want to have a family that was split already.  Merlin did not like this, seeing what it was going to bring Arthur in the end, but he could not oppose him any more than he did because the more he opposed it the more Arthur would not listen.

  

Arthur was enamoured of Guinevere’s soft sweetness there, and in less than a year’s time, they were married.  They had some years then of peace and prosperity in the kingdom, during which Arthur thought Guinevere had brought him good luck and that all of his problems were solved.  He thought Merlin had been wrong then and that what people needed was a sweet, gentle and loving presence to guide them in those ways and not the strong person Merlin had seen in the young woman Merlin had wanted Arthur to marry there.

 

Arthur was sure Merlin was not right, because he and Guinevere had good years there at first, together; enough years to build Camelot, to live the lives upon which the legends were based about how good life was there and to encourage the people to believe they could have peaceful and happy lives.  Abundance began to return the land, and the people were feeling happy and joyful, as though they were continuing to celebrate the marriage of Arthur and Guinevere, whom they seemed to have taken to heart as though they were the loving, young coule through whom they could live the love and romance that was so often missing in their own lives.  The only blight to Arthur’s seemingly happy life was that there was still no heir.

 

Arthur encouraged the people to believe that not only could they live the good life vicariously through their king and queen, they could live this life for themselves by giving them liberal tax laws that allowed them to prosper as never before.  He had numerous festivals to keep the feeling of happiness going, and human rights reached a new high point, not experienced with the Romans who had been there for so long.  It gave the people a taste of what it could be like if rulers were fair and really cared about their people.

 

But it was not that Arthur’s problems were really solved.  Some did not trouble Arthur during that time because they did not want it to look like they did not give him an opportunity to create his own downfall by being naïve and overly liberal and they needed the time to rebuild their own depleted resources, because they were lords who still did not like it that Arthur was making the people feel happy and free, and the longer this went on, the less they liked it that the people were feeling empowered in these ways.  They felt that they must do things to stop it or the people were not going to let them go on ruling in other parts of the kingdom in the ways they had gotten them used to believing they were always going to be ruled.

  

Tales of Camelot were spreading, and the people in the kingdoms of some of these lords did not like it that their own lives were not like the elaboratee tales they were hearing.  When their rulers tried to tell them that these tales they were hearing were not true but would not let them journey there to find out for themselves, the people only believed the tales all the more, and the tales grew to be more and more fantastic until it began to sound like Camelot was the land of milk and honey, where food droped off the trees and the people danced and sang in the streets all day, no longer needing to work.

 

Unfortunately not knowing who he was for so long did not prepare Arthur to feel kingly in many of the ways he needed to be.  There was competition among the heart pieces as to who had the most power there and who was the closest to King Arthur.  He thought equality was the solution to competition.  Athur had seated them all at a round table and tried hard to behave as though he was one of the knights and not that much different from any of them.  This gave the heart pieces that were there an inflated sense of themselves that he did not really like, either, when they began to give him trouble about some of his decisions.

 

 

He felt he had grown up a lot since the days when he had first offered these positions to heart pieces and regretted not having listened to Merlin when he had advised against giving them so much power and equality of position.  He felt they did not understand the depth of his consciousness in a number of ways.  He did not, therefore, like telling them everything they felt they should be priviledged to know since they sat at the Round Table, and some, who were not the allies they presented themselves to be, used this position to make Arthur feel pressured to give them information they were using against him.

  

He had a lot of trouble over issues of how to tax the people.  Some didn’t want any taxes at all, while others wanted to take way more than he needed or deemed necessary. They were beginning to havemore problems again with the invading forces of the rage fragmentation, and defending the kingdom was more expensive than Arthur thought it was going to be.  He felt the most important thing was to bring peace to the land to give the people a chance to have their lives and to give the farmers a chance to grow the food they so badly needed there.

 

He felt they must get the raging opposition to give their allegiance to his throne and stop the infighting.  He tried to get them to look to Gaul and other countries to see how inviting their shores might appear to them if it looked like they were going to go on fighting and remaining divided within, but these men were not interested in international politics; only internal squabbling, or so it appeared, until it began to look like they worked for other countries instead of for their own.

 

The guilt he had present there from not moving his emotions around these issues made it impossible for him to differentiate, too, without setting up rivalries and competitions that he feared would be weakening to his efforts to heal the country, and so he had to set policies that should not have included all the heart pieces that were present.

  

Arthur felt it was not possible to give all of the information to everyone there, especially since some had alliances with families who still directly opposed him, yet not possible to give privileged information only to some, and so some had less information than they really should have had, and some had more information than they really should have had.  This gave him a problem in making policies there if they all had an equal say in matters.

 

King Arthur thought he might be able to turn things in his own favor if he went out into his own country and let the people get to know him instead of looking to the opposing lords and thinking that the policies they were setting were coming from him when they were not.  There was a wicked agenda of taking too much from the local people and saying it was the king’s orders, not theirs.  Meanwhile it was they who lived in opulence, not the king.

 

King Arthur’s reign was not a “citizens have the vote” situation but it was a major step forward in giving the people voice, and gaining an audience with him was not that hard.  In fact, when he was traveling the land, he often sat in local pubs with the people and did not even let them know he was the king.  When he made his positions clear and then revealed he was the king, many of the people would not believe him and kept insisting it could not be true!

 

 

This gave him security problems at times when others took note of his presence and decided they could assassinate him on the road later when he left after a night of drinking with the local people, and after several harrowing escapes, he felt he always had to carry a number of knights with him who would come in later to whatever place he was sitting with the ordinary people like they weren’t really with him.

 

Some of them would get drunk and talk in ways that made him think they were not on his side at all the way they were telling people too much, distorting things or presenting pictures of the powers and glories of court that made him cringe at the imagery of what they must think their positions really meant there.

 

Arthur began to think that traveling around the land talking to the local people was not really that helpful after a number of incidents like that, and he began to question who his allies really were if if he could not even trust his own knights to feel into situations enough to know when to keep their mouths shut.

 

He felt he was not going to be able to rule his land if he did not get the people’s support somehow, and he did not know how to do this when there were local lords constantly troubling the people with policies they said were the king’s policies when they were not.  He decided to try to accomplish the same thing by just continuing with the festivals and tournaments that would get people to come together outside of their own local area and see that it was not the same everywhere.  Then they might see that some lords actually followed the king’s policies and that the people were happier and better off in those places.  This worked to a certain extent and gave the local lords who were causing the problems a harder time saying it was the king’s policies and not their own, but there were those who were still entrenched against him and would not give in, no matter what he tried.

  

Arthur wanted these lords to step down, but they were not going to do it willingly.  He was going to have to fight them down.  He hated to give them orders to step down when he knew they would not, but at least he had a legal basis for fighting them then and a lot of knights to help him, or so he thought, but when he tried to get them to go and fight with him, many of them had lost the desire to fight anymore, and Arthur feared they had gotten too used to life in court, and other than the tournaments, did not want to go out and fight anymore.  They told him he had too much ambition to try to heal the country all in one go and to give it more time.  He told them they had to go out and fight, because he was not having lords oppose him anymore.

 

Arthur was being expecially troubled by an opposing lord in a neighbouring kingdom; the very one Merlin had wanted Arthur to forge a family tie with.  He was Spirit polarized father in purple, and Merlin had originally wanted him to incarnate with Arthur there as the Spirit light Merlin saw was needed to heal the split between Body and Spirit in purple, but neither one of them could quite do it that way.  They said they were going to be allies, instead, but they weren’t, and Merlin was not able to make them become allies, either.  Arthur was deeply troubled by having problems next door.  Merlin standing over him saying, “I told you.  I tried to tell you.  You wouldn’t listen,” wasn’t improving his mood, and Guinevere didn’t like hearing Merlin say the daughter from that kingdom should have been Arthur’s wife.

 

By this time, Guinevere was not loving Arthur any more the way he wanted her to and admitted to Arthur that she loved Lancelot instead.  Arthur was devastated.  Now he felt he had no one in whom he could confide.  He had taken Lancelot in as his best friend, and Guinevere was his wife.

 

Arthur did not even know there was any problem with the way they loved each other and still did not understand it, because he had no comparable experience to theirs of his own, other than what he saw between Guinevere and Lancelot, which broke his heart.  He had so little experience with “love” when he had taken her as his wife and so little experience with love in his life there, really.  He had experienced kindliness from the family that raised him and thought that was what love was.

 

Kindliness was what he was looking for when he married Guinevere, and that was what they had together, but she did not share his passion for sex, nor could she track his consciousness everywhere he wanted her to go with him, and now, in watching her with Lancelot, he could see that there wasn’t the passion they had in his marriage with Guinevere.

 

Passion was something he feared in his imprinting, and he had wanted to find something that didn’t stir it rather than something that did, because he had it associated with his rage.  Feelings moving was not something he felt often there.  He feared it, in fact, and judged against this heavily.  Instead, he was becoming physically sick over what was happening to the life he had been so loving not that much earlier.

 

Merlin saw that this was happening to him, but he did not know how to help him much, because he could not give Arthur the life he wanted anymore; too many things had gone wrong, subtly and otherwise, for Merlin to feel like there was any possibility of it turning out the way he had wanted it to.  Arthur didn’t see that yet.

 

Lancelot was making Arthur feel like he had somehow interfered with the possibilities for Guinevere and Lancelot by getting there first, and Arthur did not like this reflection from Lancelot, either.

 

Arthur tried not to express any feelings he had of jealousy and rage, because he had judged that not to be a loving response.  He tried to make it be all about them and consideration about how they felt there, but he did not like it when they did not seem to be equally considerate of him and were letting the love between them become so obvious to the court that it was endangering his reputation.  He felt that all the love and happiness in his relationship with Guinevere was drained out of his life when Lancelot appeared, and as much as he loved him, he also hated him.  When he could not take any more of seeing his public image being as damaged as his private life already felt, the most he could do there was heated rage in his tone of voice.

 

He felt frightened for his reputation, because his hold on the kingdom was so tenuous that it seemed the opposition could use any little infraction to open giant inroads through the lack of support he was already experiencing there.  Even though he had faced opposition from the beginning, it was intensifying so much that when he looked back, those times seemed like pleasant times to him compared to what he was experiencing now.  Now he felt dismal and hopeless most of the time.  Brooding, he gave long hours to feeling his devastating heartbreak and grief there in his private chambers, but gave these feelings very little outward expression, except as actions he tried to take.

  

Guinevere had been taking herself farther and farther into Christianity or, more specifically, the Roman Catholic Church.  The longer this went on, the more it really disturbed Arthur, who had had a Celtic upbringing.  It was triggering deep and old imprints that God was a limiting, judgmental disciplinarian.  Guinevere was making him feel backed down in guilt and the vehicle she was using to do this was Christianity.  He felt he could find no solution, but then, among the many things she was telling him in her attempts to convert him, she told him about the cup used at the last supper.

 

She was trying to appease the situation there by giving up sex altogether.  This meant that Arthur was getting no sex at all, except for one night he did not understand.  He kept asking her about it, and she did not remember it.  He thought maybe it was the wine they had at dinner that night and tried to get her to repeat that, because they had not produced an heir yet, but she only drank wine for the sacraments now, and he could not get her to drink with him anymore, no matter how many how many times he told her marriage was a sacrament and so was its consummation in sex.  She guiltily refused him, and he always feared it was Lancelot, but it was not only Lancelot; it was his speaking of things that were not within the dogma of the Church she was embracing that was frightening her more and more also and was causing her to view him more and more as some sort of bestial, evil, sacrilegious pagan.

 

He feared there was no opening for him to have sex the way he wanted it anymore, and he was openly longing for it, as he had been the night it had seemed to him that she had opened her legs to him in the ways he had always wanted her to.  Now he had heard that Morgan le Fey, as she had taken to calling herself, had a son and this was even more threatening to him since he had no heir.  He feared that this son might not have the bloodline that could take over the throne, but not quite, because he did not have his bloodline.  He did not know who the father was yet.  Morgan had not told him, and he feared illegitimacy in the family again and how that was going to look to the people who were converting to Christianity, but Morgan did not care about them and said so openly.

 

He did not know yet that it was his own son from that night, or that she actually hated him so much and was actually cunning enough that she had tricked him by drugging them both that night.  She acted sweet in his presence, even sweeter than Guinevere at times.

 

“As long as she gets what she wants.” Merlin had said.  “If she doesn’t, then you’ll see how unsweet she is,” but he had trouble seeing that.  He was starved for love and took in kindness as love over and over, failing to see the guile behind much of it.  She had put a spell on him, too, which was in the potion of drugs she put in the wine, hallucinogenics, while Guinevere’s was a sleeping potion.  And hadn’t she helped her ever so kindly to bed that night and sat with her until she was deeply asleep!

 

Arthur was longing for Guinevere so much that night that he actually saw her face when Morgaine had slipped into bed with him when she thought he must, by then, be so drunk and drugged that he wouldn’t notice in the dark.  She had gotten him involved so fast sexually, too, that he had orgasmed almost before he knew it.  He felt it rock his body and fell asleep so fast in an ecstasy that he had not felt for so long that he actually wept when it happened and begged Guinevere to please love him and to come to him more often like this.

 

Morgaine said everything he wanted to hear that night and did not mean a word of it.  She was after only one thing; to steal his son the way she felt her mother’s son had been stolen from her, and in the way she knew was best to do it, because then she could raise him herself and make sure he had the attitudes she wanted him to have.  Her mother had had other sons, but they were not the same, because the first one was the heir to the throne.  Even though they had protested it, saying they were legitimate because their father had married their mother by then, they did not succeed, because his father had not disowned him, which counted for something in that half Celtic world.

 

All alone in his chambers at night, Arthur mused over this night so many times in his anguish and heartbreak that he finally went to Guinevere one more time and told her all about it, begging her to remember it.  She gave him only excuses such as she had had too much wine that night and did not remember what had happened.  They got into a fight in which he insisted that it had to be her and that she must remember it.  “Guinevere,” he said, “you used to love me in that way.  Can you honestly say you don’t love me that way anymore?”

 

“I do not love you in that way, and I never have,” she said, “although I did not know it until I met Lancelot, but now that I know Lancelot, I cannot have sex with you when it is him that I love in that way.  It could not have been me; it must have been another woman.”

 

Arthur was devastated and begging her to help him here, because he was afraid he was losing his mind.  It was then that she said Morgaine was sitting close by and had noticed when she arose from the table that night that she had had too much wine.  She had been kindly enough to help her to her bed so that no one else would notice that the queen had gotten drunk in public.  “She is my witness that I did not go to your bed that night but to my own, as my chambermaids are a witness, too!”

 

Arthur did not need to question the chambermaids.  He knew now what had happened or feared that he did.  He left Guinevere’s chambers in a frightened rage and rode all the way to Morgaine’s without stopping that night.  He rode all of the next day, too, only changing his horse when he had to.  When he arrived he was not fit to be greeted by his half-sister, but he insisted on seeing her anyway.  He demanded to know who the father of her child was, and when she would not tell him, he demanded to see the child.  He was just of the age he would have been if it had been her that night, and he told her he suspected her of this.

 

“And if it were to be true?  She said.  “What are you going to do about it now, Arthur?  Ah, sweet, guileless Arthur.”  She was facing away from him when she said this and turned toward him suddenly, startling him, because she looked like a witch.  “You had it coming, Arthur!  Oh, how you had it coming!  Now the tables are turned!  Now it’s another person trying to gain the position of the bloodline by any means necessary!”

 

Arthur was devastated for the third time in as many days.  He had nothing to say to her.  What could he say?  He thought of saying, “But Morgaine, did it have to be like this?” only he could not.  There was no openness toward him there.  She was cold toward him; so very cold!

 

 

He got on his horse and rode away, facing two days back with no food, since he had brought nothing with him but his sword.  He feared for his own life now and tried to ride as fast as he could, but his horse was tired, and he could only lose himself in the woods, hoping he would be hard to follow that way.  He wandered for days, lost in what seemed like a hostile wilderness of brambles and thickets until his horse’s flesh was so ripped up he was not sure if they were going to make it or not.

 

During that time, it was as if he was lost in the wilderness of his own soul.  He feared he was going crazy because he was having thoughts of having to kill his own son, feeling his heart heavy, because he did not think he could really do that, but he was hearing voices say, “He could do that to you, and will, unless you kill him first.”  He had many voices telling him many things there, but he could make little sense of it and was afraid that it was all too much for him and that he was taking sick because he could not hold his body together under the weight of it all.

 

He finally made it back to Camelot, so bedraggled, dirty, scratched and downhearted that he was almost unrecognizable as their king at first.  He had found nothing but brackish water for so long that his first cry was for help getting down from his horse, and the second was for water.  If his was not such a hospitable castle, they would have turned him out and never looked to see who he really was.

 

He got to his chambers and never recovered really.  He feared he had caught some kind of fever in the swamps, and it never seemed to go away after that.  He had no heart for living, but he did not know what to do with his heartbreak; it seemed to be too huge.  As time went on and Arthur was not recovering, he called his knights to him over and over, telling them he saw no hope but to somehow recover the Holy Grail, because he was not going to live much longer without it.  He became fixed on this as something that could help him there.  Some did not want him to live, and did not look for it, but others tried their best and still did not find it.

 

He said a lot of disjointed things in his deliriums that frightened them, but the more he said things about having no hope without the Holy Grail and about having to kill his own son, the more frightened Guinevere and the knights became.  The Church told Guinevere Arthur was becoming possessed, and many of the knights believed it when she told them this.

 

Merlin was watching all this, feeling less and less received by Arthur when he tried to advise him about anything, but he said nothing more there.  He simply told Arthur he was going away and might not return, with a sort of “resigned to fate” presentation that was going to let Arthur interpret it as implying whatever Arthur was going to take it to mean there.  Arthur did not know if this meant Merlin was going to die, or what it meant, but it gave him another feeling of abandonment and withdrawal of help and advice, right when he felt he most needed it, and he blamed Merlin for it.

 

Arthur certainly hadn’t always agreed with Merlin and didn’t like it when Merlin tried to override him.  Arthur also did not like it when Merlin wasn’t there, but their blueness, and the other ways in which they were polarized, seemed to be making it too much for either of them to bridge the gap they had there.

 

Arthur responded to Merlin first by imploring him not to leave that way, and then, when Merlin did not respond to this with anything Arthur wanted to hear there, with the hardened heart they had allowed to form between them there.  Arthur told Merlin, “Go ahead and go then.  You have not been giving me very good advice for a long time now anyway, or I would not be where I am!”

 

Merlin did not like feeling blamed by Arthur in this way and responded with, “You never listened to any of my advice or implemented in the way I meant for it to be implemented, so how do you know where you might be if you had listened to me!”

 

There was some arguing back and forth about who did not listen to who, and then Arthur turned away from Merlin, and Merlin walked away from Arthur and removed himself from Camelot.

  

Guinevere removed herself to a convent, not able to face what was becoming of her husband and began to pray fro him, which she could not do in his presence anymore, because he was so furious over her disapproval of his Celtic ways.  She regretted having hurt Arthur like this, but she could not bring herself to do differently, she could not embrace his Celtic ways along with her Christianity, she could not have sex with him when she did not love him in that way, and she could not make herself love him in that way.  She was watching her husband be destroyed and watching his kingdom fall with him, but rather than thinking she could help by coming out of the Church and giving him the divorce he needed there, she believed it when the Church said it was all because he was a not really a Christian.

 

It would have been a simple matter if they were both Celtic, and this, Arthur could not understand.  How had he gotten himself so entangled in a foreign Church that did not even serve his needs, equated his beliefs with paganism, enslaved and imprisoned him sexually and, in so many other ways, made his own life and the lives of so many other people so miserable that he began to think that ignorance was bliss, since the Church said he was living in ignorance before.

 

When they had talked about divorce, Guinevere had said there was no way, once she had taken the vows of the Church, to come out of it without being an excommunicated woman whose soul would then go to hell for all eternity.  Arthur could not understand how the loving God they talked about could treat people like this, and besides, what had happened to reincarnation?

  

They had all talked about this and believed in it before. What about that now?  Didn’t she believe in this anymore?  She said only that the Church mentioned it but that they did not place any importance on it anyway, because the most important thing was to become free of sin and go to heaven.  “Wherever that is,” he would say to her.  “Ascend from Earth, I mean,” she would say back.

 

This troubled Arthur very much, because he was trying to bring heaven on Earth in the sense of trying to bring a good life there that would be as pleasant as anyone could imagine.  It was his goal in uniting the kingdom, in trying to bring peace, in building Camelot and in everything else he had done or tried to do.

 

It was extremely perturbing to him to see a religion taking over his people that was shunning Earthly existence and the Body and calling all the pleasures they had previously enjoyed as natural and a celebration of physical existence, sin; one in which his own religion was being called the cause of sin and one in which his queen was participating more and more to the point of withdrawing from him, from her position as his queen and from her own kingdom to the extent of retreating into a convent, giving nothing to him anymore or to her people.  She gave no balance of leadership.  There was no more mother presence; only an aura of sin, withdrawal and shame at Camelot now.

 

It was too much for Arthur along with his heart sickness over his own child being born the way he was instead of with Guinevere and all the rest of it.  He had not even felt able to tell Guinevere about it, but others did, and she then trusted Arthur even less, not knowing what to trust or how this had happened since they weren’t speaking to each other with trust anymore.

 

Arthur began to withdraw his essence from that lifetime and to wither at a rather young age into and old man with the feeling that he had failed everyone, failed at everything he had tried todo there, and failed himself, most of all.  He was very hard on himself there, and in his deliriums, he made many journeys towards My light, asking Me what he should do there, what he could do there and even begging for my help.

 

He was quite pitiful, and I wanted to help him, but there was not much I could do, because he was not ready to understand the complexities of the situation he was finding himself trapped in.  They were too many and too big.

  

He was hearing the increasing bad news of Mordred’s attitude toward him and felt sure his mother had poisoned him against him irreparably.  In the state of mind he was in, there was no rest or peace, and he was becoming more haggard day by day.  He had lost his desire for life and all his dreams.  He did not know what to trust or how to sort out what he was seeing and hearing in his deliriums, except his own inner feelings that kept returning him to the idea of finding the Holy Grail and saving his people that way.  It had become an obsession with him now and only his caring for the people that made him try to keep going, but it seemed like even they did not want him anymore.

 

He had wanted, more than anything on Earth, to have the life he really wanted to have and did not like all of the movement of rage around him that was making this so difficult.  This went on for many long years, during which time he was receiving increasing reports of the land withering around Camelot.  They had had such a period of peace and prosperity in Camelot when he and Guinevere felt like they loved each other.  Why couldn’t this have lasted!  He did not know what was causing this, but the people were becoming as disheartened and depressed as he was.

 

There had been too much fighting for them to be able to farm adequately.  Their houses had been destroyed too many times for them to feel like rebuilding anymore.  They had had too many years of not enough good food or comfortable shelter because of this.  They had had two generations grow up knowing almost nothing but strife in their homeland. They were losing heart in themselves and their faith in King Arthur’s ability to heal these problems.

 

They were being taken over by another religion that was telling them their own ways weren’t any good and that they were such sinners that they feared they deserved this and more, but even more than that, many people had a strange illness like Arthur’s that many of the Celtic people were waying was because the Romans had started draining the marshlands there and had disturbed something in the natural balance of things.

 

The land’s water table sank slowly when the Romans began to drain it, and there were many dead bodies decaying in the open air, yetkept continually damp; things that had lived there when there was more water and could not live there anymore.  The land had been covered with shallow sea water and marshlands and was now only brackish.  It no longer supported the rich marshland fish and bird population, nor could it bring forth crops.  There were many carrion eating birds circling in the air, which was further disheartening and frightening, and even they did not want to eat much of this flesh, because there was too much of it.  There was disease coming forth from this and from people who had died from the fighting in the marshlands and were not buried.

 

Truly the dark ages that have been described as descending in the aftermath of Rome’s withdrawal were descending upon the people in spite of King Arthur’s attempt to make it better than it had ever been under the Romans.  Since many of these problems were not so vividly apparent until after the Romans withdrew, Arthur’s opposition tried to say it was all a result of his poor leadership and convinced many of the people this was true.

 

They made his problems with Lancelot into a scandal and used it against him, instead of having any heart towards Arthur’s pain there, even saying the king was impotent.  They hoped to goad him into saying Mordred was his son so they could have a further scandal.

 

The Church played a role in telling Guinevere that she should not have sex with Arthur anymore, because they did not like his non-Christian leanings.  They did not say it that way though.  They said it was not right to have sex with him unless he became a Christian.  This brought a lot of pressure to bear on their marriage that was not necessary, except that the Church was playing a manipulative role there, and even when Arthur did finally “become a Christian”, they did not accept him, and Guinevere did not have sex with him anyway.

 

The Church had an agenda, which was to use Guinevere to cast him in the light of a sinner in fron of the people and make them see him as the cause of their problems and the cause of the blight upon the land.  Then they could discredit him, unseat him and put another in his place; one who would be more compliant with where they wanted things to go, which was back toward Roman ways more than Arthur liked.

 

Mordred was only fourteen when Morgaine, having already given Mordred the training she wanted him to have, felt it was the time to attack Arthur because he looked so weak to her.  Mordred wanted to just leave his father to die and then claim “his throne,” as his mother had always told him it would be, but Morgaine still wanted her revenge and wanted Mordred to kill Arthur for her.

 

When Mordred tried to oppose her, she would not listen.  She gave Mordred many pieces of information designed to incite him into a fury of hatred toward his father and then pushed him out to do battle with him when Arthur was the most ill and the most forlorn over everything that was crumbling in his kingdom.  Mordred’s fury was sure he hated his father, but he was not sure at the same time, and when he delivered his blow, it was a blow of divided intent that did not kill his father outright on the battlefield.

 

Although many of his knights had left him by then, the ones who were still loyal to Arthur managed to get him to the Isle of Avalon, where they hoped the healing arts that were known there could save him still, but Arthur never recovered.  His heart for living was gone.  His skull was cracked and his brain damaged.  They did what they could for him there, but after a long period of uncertainty as to whether he should leave that life or not, he gave it up and was buried there at Avalon.

 

Mordred was never taken seriously as a possibility for king there and never had been.  He was declared illegitimate by the standards of the new religion, the Roman Catholic Church, which Morgan le Fey refused to recognize for the power it had to take over the land and sweep away the old Celtic ways.  She tried to make Mordred be the one to save the old ways for her.

 

She did not recognize Arthur as having realized that Christianity could not be stopped there, and Arthur had not realized that the Church was going to be so intolerant of Celtic ways.  Morgaine blamed him for allowing this to happen through Guinevere.

 

Morgaine had told Mordred he could save the old ways for her by killing Arthur, but the old ways could not be saved unless more people recognized the importance of having both sides of these seemingly opposing viewpoints, as both sides of the gap, find the balance needed between them to really make the bridge between the two worlds that needed to happen there.  Green is that bridge between the upper and lower chakras, and this needs to happen now.

 

 

 

 

Paul Merlin Cornell Du Houx

 

 

When Merlin left Arthur he had reached the chapter in his life where he went to Morgan le Fey.  He had a deep resentment by then that did not mind the idea of displacing Arthur, but he did not admit this to himself.  When Merlin saw what was configuring there in Morgaine, Merlin thought she was right, Arthur didn’t know what he was doing, but he did not want to admit this to his conscious mind, either.

 

Morgaine was building power within herself and was feeling power come into her.  She thought she was gaining power through the practice of her magical arts, but she was taking in lost Will rage at the Father of Manifestation (Arthur), including some of the Mother’s rage, and her magical arts were calling this to her.

 

Over and over, she talked to the ethers, forming her plan and drawing to her any energy that would be in alliance with her plan, drawing only feelings similar to her own.  She also had ears at the castle and especially did not want to hear that Guinevere was pregnant.  Potions were delivered to the castle and given to Guinevere to drink without her knowing that they prevented pregnancy.  When the opportunity came to disgrace Arthur through Lancelot’s appearance she took full advantage of it.  Then, she felt, if an heir was ever produced, it would be easy to cast doubt on the parentage. 

 

 

She found herself drawing lords who opposed Arthur.  They wanted to have sex with her.  They all pressed themselves on her.  She told them all, “If you help me take Arthur from his throne and put Mordred in his place, you can have me sexually.”

 

 

 

They had many years to wait while Mordred had to grow up, and it was not easy to keep her allies together for that time, but she continually reminded them that they had a mission and a purpose for remaining allies there.  She also kept them in a sexual frenzy by dosing them with potions of hallucinogenics and aphrodisiacs and then telling them her sexuality was the most powerful.

 

Morgaine thought she could control them through sex, and especially power sex, but her allies were restless and insisted they wanted another heir presented to them in case anything went wrong with her plan.  Now Morgaine was put in the position of having to decide who the father of this child was going to be.

 

When Merlin came, he felt like the piece she needed.  He had bloodlines she liked; they were celtic.  The others did not like that, because it could not be established clearly who he was or where he came from.  They were all still more interested in putting themselves on one of their sons on the throne, but Morgaine thought that if she established a bond with Merlin, he would put her son on the throne the way he had Arthur.

 

When she saw that Mordred might not be powerful enough on his own or he would have more heart for winning the battles she thought he needed to be winning to wrest the throne from Arthur, and less laziness, as she saw it, she decided he needed more power, and more magic was how she planned to get it; even if she had to trick him, Merlin was going to help her.

 

Merlin was feeling he would have been more the right person to have had the throne there, but he was more interested in magic than he was in doing battle for power, and was too old and had been too reluctant for too long to be able to step forward publicly and do it then.  It did not escape Merlin that his own bloodlines were close to what they would have needed to take the throne, though, and he felt that if he fathered a son through Morgan le Fey, the right bloodlines would be there.

 

Morgaine was determined to replace Arthur with her own son, which at the time was only Mordred, and if not, then with the next son, who she was going to have with Merlin.  When Merlin made his proposal to Morgaine, Morgaine did not let him know that she had been thinking this herself.  She feigned cool aloofness to the idea but then she said she would agree to the proposal only if Merlin would teach her his magic and entrust her with all he knew as the mother of his son.

 

Merlin knew Morgaine was being played there by the opponents of Arthur who were going to support Mordred only long enough to use him to kill Arthur and then take the throne for one of them by raising public opinion against him as having killed his own father.

 

Merlin thought that his son would be a more loving and balanced presence to have on the throne than Mordred ever could be and, so, thought their bacck-up plan of putting his son on the throne was a better plan; if he could put his heir on the throne.  But first, Merlin needed to be there to help his son grow up the way he wanted him to.

 

Merlin thought that agreeing to teach Morgaine was his only real opportunity to be near his own son and raise him, instead of letting Morgaine do what she did to Mordred all over again, but he was going to need to drag this out over the many years it was going to take his son to grow up by being a reluctant teacher and by stressing that he had studied magic all his life and that what he knew was no quick mastery of potions.

 

He did not think he could go down, himself, there.  He eventhought that he could teach her in such a way that she would not be able to use it properly for her own power, and when she played inept in his presence as part of her fluttering femininity act, he even thought it did not matter what he really taught her, but dragging it out as he did gave her much time to practice over and over what he taught her and get really good at it.

 

Merlin thought his own son would get to grow up in his presence and would not fall prey to the hatred Morgan le Fey had trained her own son to have and that he would not have to experience the cruelty of her rage, either, but after giving birth to Merlin’s son, she began to have fits of rage which she took out on the child when Merlin would not teach her what she wanted to know quickly enough.  Morgan le Fey was intimidating him with her rage, which he did not like having to experience there or have his son experience either.  He did not like her rage there, and he did not love her, but he did not leave.

 

Whenever taking her rage out on their son did not work, as a manipulation tool, Morgaine used her sweetness and guile, which worked better on him than he thought it would, because he was love starved.  Even though he was a participant who saw what Morgaine was doing to Arthur, Merlin did not think it could happen to him.  He thought he was smarter than that and could not go down the way Arthur would, which was correct.  He was going to go down another way.  Hmmph.

 

 

When Morgaine did not think she had to learn magic from Merlin anymore, she was really finished with him and began to have more fits of rage, alternating with begging him to teach her the one last thing she really wanted to know.  She wheedled her way to getting Merlin to show her by telling him she would not take her anger out on their son anymore if he did not make her so angry by refusing to teach her what she wanted to know.

 

She kept insisting there must be more to his magic than he was letting her know.  She keps insisting that she wanted to be able to manipulate the elements which he did not want to let her learn because of her rage and the role it was playing there.  He finally told her he would teach her how to slow down her breathing and go into deep meditation the way he did, because he thought it might calm down her rage.  He told her it would make her ageless, like him.

 

He could go for a long period of time without breathing by lowering his vibratory rate and, thus, his metabolic rate.  When he was not very conscious anmore, which she had helped along by putting something in his last meal he had eaten there, she sealed him in the cave where they were with no way out.  Now Merlin really could not be there for his son anymore, and his son did not know where to look for him.

 

Morgaine simply told him his father had gone away with no explanation.  This son was never seriously considered for the throne, either.  No one really believed that Merlin was the father of this son, no one really knew who Merlin was or where he had really come from and Merlin was not there to argue his case.

 

After this, Merlin did not know for a long time how he wanted to move outwardly, or if he even could move outwardly.  He spent a long time thinking he would not try to recover his magic.  He felt betrayed and did not recognize his own role in setting himself up there.  He hated rage and yet found himself surrounded by it.  He always tried to be the loving one that did not have to rage.

 

One of the most important messages in all of this is to move our own rage instead of letting ourselves be encircled by it in a state of denial, while thinking we are more loving than that.

 

All Morgan le Fey had to say about it was that she could not have imprisoned him in stone if he had not already imprisoned his own heart that way.

Welcome!

 This is not a pro-Hitler blog.  True, the posts labeled “This!” parts one and two are presently the core of it.  New readers should see these first.  If they aren’t showing in the inventory to the right, scroll this page down to them.

 

“This!” tries to understand Hitler by searching for a meaningful, balanced understanding of who he was, what he did, tried to achieve, why, and… why he failed. 

 

Our core contention is:  some of the people he trusted the most, including Goering, Goebbels, Himmler, and even Speer hurt and betrayed him…  even more than he realized during his final days. 

 

Granted he encouraged their exploitation of his abilities by using tensions between them to motivate them.  Most likely seeing this as a proactive management technique – at the time.

 

The point of view that holds he egged them on to commit the maximum amount of vicious cruelty possible is probably fallacious.  It’s more likely he tried to get them to be pragmatic about taking decisions in the life and death predicament of total war back then:  when war was still sacred.

 

To understand how he was blindsided by them consider how the behavior of Oliver North, John Poindexter, Monica Lewinsky, John Haldeman… and others:  impacted the US presidents they worked for.  Not only in terms of what they did (for or to them) but also:  how much information they withheld (from them.)  And further:  how unwilling the US and global population has been to allow itself to become aware of or know about the genocides of Pol Pot in Thailand and recently in Rwanda and Serbia.

 

Van Morrison said:  “It’s so cruel to expect a savior to save the world!” 

 

It’s cruel to blame Adolf Hilter for the actions of lieutenants he gathered round him, seeking men he could trust.  Who then:  set out to exploit his talent and ability with utter selfishness.  While knowing:  he eschewed narcissism and gave his name, identity, and person to the Nazi movement as a means to an end.  Which:  he failed to achieve.

 

Hitler was a real person, not an invention of Hollywood l ike Superman, Spiderman, Ironman, Hell Boy or any of the other fantasy heroes created to make a point.  I personally believe his soul has figured out what it cost the world – and him – to delegate his power to weak men:  by now.

 

As the fallout from the present Global Banking Crisis (GBC) works its way down the food chain:  where is the bailout that will protect those at the bottom?  Who face potential misery and starvation on a scale many dimensions more harrowing than the Holocaust or the genocide of the Armenians during World War One?

 

“The click is the new bullet” is our motto on this site.  Here you can learn to use your clicks wisely. 

 

The USA can safely disarm.  It’s not the bulwark of freedom it thinks it has to be.  There’s no need to fight WW3 with bullets.  Understanding Hitler is the way to go.  This GBC did not “just happen”, and it wasn’t caused by the Jews.  We’re Jews!  Don’t you dare blame WW3 on Us!

 

We urge you to help us identify and prosecute the individuals who caused the War of Clicks – WW3 – now:  immediately.  Give meaning to the Global Banking Crisis (GBC) by understanding why it happened!

 

By definition:  holding the Nuremberg Trials after the fact equaled waiting until it was too late.  It no longer makes sense to keep our finger on the pause button to see what happens.  

 

This vapid state of mind which says “no one caused the banking crisis:  it just happened” is rubbish!  It’s not the result of a certain amount of bad judgment, which is going to rectify itself as “the system” processes its own defects, defaults, and crap.  How naïve are you?

 

The GBC happened so that we can identify the perpetrators.  If we don’t do this:  the past 40 years of struggle, and mountains of technological progress – have all occurred for nothing.

 

Wake up! 

 

You’re one of them, if you have the mindset that says “I’ll try to make as much money as I can; to hell with what else happens.”  Sort yourself out, now, or:  We will take you down!

 

“Making money” and “the profit motive” aren’t sacred rights enshrined in any constitution.  They are legitimate by-products.  Finding meaning is a valid goal.  Whatever meaning you’re attracted to:  go for it!  Money can never be more than a means to an end.  The idea it is legitimate to do ‘whatever it takes’ to get it:  is wrong thinking.

 

If Hitler were alive today – which he is not – I just wrote this “if” to make a point (read Rudyard Kipling’s poem called “If”… IF you’re not sure what I mean!) if the person I understand Hitler to have been were alive right now:  he would make sure those responsible for causing the GBC were discovered, tried according to the laws for prosecuting white collar crime, sentenced, and…  put to work to reverse the harm they brought into this world.

 

Moreover:  since the Internet exists…  If Adolf Hitler were born in 1989 instead of 1889:  he wouldn’t need to become a dictator to get this snowball rolling.  He wouldn’t have to become Chancellor of Germany to be heard!   He wouldn’t need to become an anti-semite:  to get elected.

 

All he would need is “the Word”.  One tiny little blog:  somewhere in cyberspace.  And “Readers” – a very loaded word on this particular site! – with imagination.

 

Yeah!   Check out this poem:

 

 

Land of Pan

 

OK,

 

well…

 

small into big, then

 

big into small again, & feast into famine:

 

these are the ways of magic

 

metamorphosis,

 

change and transition

 

Once upon a time…

 

A corporal turned

 

World War One

 

into WWII

 

this was some spell!

 

The only thing we cannot do

 

is:  turn bad into good

 

if only we could

 

do this too!

 

Maybe we should…

 

accept we can’t;

 

love your little note

 

don’t mind the delay one micro-bit

 

and like it that you don’t feel pressured by us

 

you’re one amazing woman who has pretty much set herself free, by now

 

it will be a real treat for me to find out what you make of some

passages in these books,

 

as time unrolls its measures

Ideal Money / Honest Politicians

THE GREAT JOHN NASH

 

He just keeps on getting greater, as more time goes by, his accomplishments stand clear on their own merit.  At the time this account of a lecture given by him at Smith in 2004 was published it seemed too much to expect he would ever be listened to.  Not now.  

 

Yes now, just five years later, his ideas are being STRUCK INTO THE COIN OF COMMON USAGE.  Right here, in this cyberspace:  the Right Use of Will it seemed almost impossible to implement in time to forestall catastrophic Earth Changes is happening.

 

Blog by blog from little sky to tiny ocean down the number line on and on past the realm of imaginary numbers and computational psi prime cypher-cratic; cyberspace is surrendering, in awe, to:

 

THE GREAT JOHN NASH 


Even Nobel Prize winners sometimes struggle with the tools of the digital economy. I’m not quite prepared for the actual technology here, Dr. John F. Nash, Jr. joked, after having sometrouble with the Frank Auditoriums projection system. Nash, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994, spoke to a packed auditorium and three overflow rooms on October 14, 2004, at the University Alumni Associations Alumni College event, held in Van Munching Hall, home of the Smith School of Business.

Nash’s audience of alumni, faculty and students were treated to a scholarly discussion of Ideal Money and an overview of its long and interesting history as a medium of exchange.

The Dismal Science


Nash reflected on the bad reputation money has acquired throughout history. Religion and philosophy generally regard money in a negative light, according to Nash. Money is associated with sin and evil; Judaism, Christianity and Islam consider the lending of money at interest usury; and wealth is seen as leading to the temptations of greed, avarice, selfishness, and an absence of charity, Nash said. The association of currency with the clearly mundane and possibly unclean has affected the popular view of economics as well. Economics has been called the dismal science, said Nash.

Nash made the argument that money is a good thing if used for the common good. It is money as a means for the transfer of utility in which Nash was interested.

Money, Utility and Game Theory
Nash reflected on how Keynesian-style microeconomics has affected American economic theory. Keynes theories are oriented toward fixing problems, the economic equivalent of a hospital, Nash said. In modern times we see this attitude reflected in the state establishment of a central bank and treasury that manipulates the national currency in order to, for instance, reduce inflation, without regard to how those manipulations affect the long-term reputation of that currency.

Ideally, says Nash, money should be a standard of measurement comparable to the watt or the hour or a degree of temperature used to measure the transfer of utility. Nash acknowledged, however, that the psychological reaction of humans to money is such that it may never be possible to create a perfectly ideal currency standard. Money is linked directly to utility, but utility for money is a non-linear function, said Nash.  You might not be ten times more happy to be getting ten billion dollars than one billion dollars. One billion might be enough.

Much of the talk used the European Unions currency the Euros an example of the changes we are seeing to our idea of money and as a jumping off point to discuss the money of the future. Nash believes that in the near future we may see fewer and fewer national currencies and an increased number of multi-national currencies, like the Euro Afro and Yen that will stand in relative competition to each other.  

<  end of commentary on his lecture >

What Nash believes, tends to happen!  His thoughts are law in seven of the eight dimensions.

Allocation of value to a basket of price indexes on seven continents updated 42 times a minute is ONE HALF of the current global equilibrium implementation strategy.  Defining Properties:  asymmetric, non-ideal, convertible, assymptotic.

The other half is tamper proof currency, logarithmic distribution patterns, and infrequent tests of the emergency broadcast system:  to check which one is paying attention.

According to Meg Ryan:  NO ONE IS PAYING ATTENTION!  

The lecture summarized above appears in the post below titled:  ”Lecture by John F. Nash Jnr.”  The lecture by Prof Nash reproduced here (under the same heading) is about “a parallel concept which relates to political realities, psychology influencing the actions of politicians and voters or citizens.”  As I understand him this means he’s explaining the possible consequences of creating a direct correspondence between honest money and honest people.  

Our version of this idea, LUWM = the Limbic User Will Matrix – has yet to be introduced:  on this site.

Asymptotically Ideal Money [political version]

 

     After writing and speaking on a concept of “Ideal Money” which was

itself arrived at after many years of meditation I now have also thought

of a parallel concept which relates to political realities, psychology

influencing the actions of politicians and voters or citizens, and which

provides a concept of what may actually transpire in the evolution of

customs and culture (as it were) relating to money.

    The ultimately launched concept of “Ideal Money” became possible when

I conceived of a practical basis for a standardization of the comparison

of the value of the currency with an appropriate standard or ideal. And

the key to that was the idea of an ICPI or (international) “Industrial

Consumption Price Index“. (That is thus like the U.S. CPI which controls

Social Security payouts but is adapted to relate to industrial producers

rather than to individuals and it is envisioned as being essentially

dependent, by choice of its definition, on costs that are very global in

nature, like, for example, the cost of oil from OPEC and other producers

or the cost of platinum, tungsten, or nickel.)

   But one cannot logically feel confident of the adoption internationally

of an ideal system of currency or currencies in an achievement analogous

to the achievement of the metric system or of “the euro”. Such a result

would necessarily have a political content since it is the states that

control and supply the various currencies that are in use at the present

time. And projects requiring political support may be difficult to achieve

or comparatively easy to achieve depending on elements of “political

reality” which may differ considerably from the actual merits or lack of

merits of the projects (as evaluated from, say, a scientific or economic

or medical viewpoint).

   So it occurs to me to think that that which is not achieved by a grand

action of establishment by “fiat” may alternatively tend to come into

existence as a consequence of a process of evolution. And of course, after

a certain degree of progress by “evolution” the rest of the progress could

possibly be realized by a convention or a process of “fiat”.

 

 

                Currencies of Improving Quality

 

    From the viewpoint of parties domiciled outside of the territory

of where a specific currency (such as, e.g. the currency of Brazil) is

established the “quality” of that currency is evaluated according to the

reasonable appraisals of the probabilities of loss in value of the unit

of that currency, particularly in comparison with other currencies and

also in comparison with alternatives available for use for “storage of

value”, like gold or commodities in general.

    The more that the probabilities of loss seem to be large the more

that currency will be evaluated as of “low quality”.

    On the other hand, “Keynesian” central bankers or associated and

advising economists, WITHIN the state responsible for the currency

in question (such as, e.g. Brazil), may be arguing that they should

have and use methods of operation that will tend to act in varying

degrees at various times to increase the supply of the currency and

thus cause, ultimately, declines in its value. They may argue that these

actions, in which they have some discretionary options, are beneficial

for the general welfare within the territory of the state (e.g., Brazil).

    Whether or not the options exploited by “Keynesian” central bankers

and advisors are beneficial to the general welfare in the corresponding

territories (e.g., Brazil) it is very clear, game theoretically, that

they give those who can act on these options ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES that

they otherwise would not be likely to have available. So it is also

plausible that psychologically the having of these options would seem

to be very desirable in contrast to their renunciation.

    So I want to suggest now the possibility that, within the context

of varieties of currencies which are of the type typically found nowadays

and since the time of the influence of “the Keynesians” (and after the

time of the formerly used “gold standard” or other forms of currency

linked to a value standard), there is some real possibility that the

typical “rate of depreciation” of currencies may tend to decrease. Thus

there may evolve more disillusionment with the “Keynesian” methods that

tend to cause to exist a continual (sometimes intermittent) deterioration

in the internationally observable value of a specific national currency.

(This would apply to “the euro” also, as if that were effectively the

currency of an “United States of Europe”.)

    The actors on the stage of the drama formed by the actions that

determine the trends in the value of a national currency are themselves

players in a game and they can be rationally viewed as such. The theme

of “rational expectations” naturally enters. Those who ARE NOT in

control but who ARE naturally concerned with the expectations for the

value trend of a national currency cannot be wisely assumed to be

entirely naive and unable to form “rational expectations” regarding

the currency. So the (possibly) “Keynesian” players in this game have

natural opponents (or co-players, beyond zero-sum perspectives) who

are interested in not being themselves “outsmarted” by those who

control the options that determine, say, the quantity supplied of

the national currency.

 

 

        Signs of Attitudes (Among Central Banking Authorities)

 

    On the web page of the Swedish State Bank there appears a sort of

speedometer measuring the rate of inflation. The fact that this appears

indicates several things about the psychology of the responsible

authorities there. One of these is that they have the concept that

the government can choose policies to control the rate indicated and

that varying consequent results (as regards the value of that rate of

depreciation (of the value of the currency)) may be achieved as a result

of various conceivable choices of policy. (In the case of a poorer

nation it might seem more likely that the authorities would not usually

seem to have any ability to control the rate of inflation, as measured

modulo the domestic currency of that poorer nation.)

    Now the possible area for evolution is that if, say, an inflation

rate of between 1% and 3% is now considered desirable and appropriate

in Sweden, then, if it is really controllable, why shouldn’t a rate

between 1/2 % and 3/2 % be even more desirable? (The rate measured by

the swedish speedometer is determined in relation to a domestic CPI

calculated for Sweden.)

 

 

       Signs of the Times (Among National Currency Authorities)

 

    Comparatively very recently a few countries in South America and

Central America have adopted schemes that put them in positions

analogous to those of Luxembourg and Liechtenstein with regard to the

provisions for their domestic currency. Here Argentina and El Salvador

can be mentioned. They are adopting (at least temporarily) expedients

that put the value of their domestic money on a fixed relation to the

U. S. dollar. And of course Panama has had such a situation for a long

time previously.

    This is not “ideal money” because the U. S. dollar is not an ideal

standard for money value. But the countries adopting such expedients

thus offer their citizens, at least for as long as they manage to or

choose to continue it, a deliverance from a typical past tradition

of national currencies of even less stable value than that of the

(historically observed) U. S. dollar.

    But if, for example, all of the countries of the world would base

the value for their national currencies on the value of the british

currency then this situation would appear singular and unstable, while

it was not so singular for a lot of countries to base their currency

value on gold.

    So the United Nations building can be in New York and the IMF and

the IBRD institutions in Washington, DC, USA, but these historical

facts do not make the U. S. dollar a good standard of value which the

managers of currency systems in other countries could justifiably

exploit to permanently fix the relative values of their national

currencies.

    The metric system does not work because french chefs de cuisine

are constantly cooking up new and delicious culinary creations which

the rest of the world then follows imitatively. Rather, it works

because it is something invented on a scientific basis and in fact,

after Waterloo, it was not first accepted in France but rather in

The Netherlands.

 

 

                 Price Indexes in General

 

     Various states calculate some sort of a CPI or measure of the

“cost of living” for inhabitants of their territory. It is possible

that “globalization” and in general trends leading to more non-local

sources for basic needs like food and clothing will have the effect

of making CPI indices calculated in different states tend to become

concordant. Of course the effects of taxes can be very complicating

in relation to comparisons of distinct national CPI indices.

    It seems possible and not unlikely, however, that if two states

evolve towards having currencies or more stable value as measured

locally by national CPI indices that then also these distinct

currencies would tend to evolve towards more stable comparative

relations of value.

    Then the limiting or “asymptotic” result of such an evolutionary

trend would be in effect “ideal money” but this as a result achieved

without the adoption of anything like an ICPI index as a basis for

the standard of value.

 

 

                   Tax Revenues Complications

 

    It is very well known among economists who study “macroeconomics”

(or the large scale picture of a national economy) that inflation, of

itself, produces the effect of varieties of taxation.

    On the one hand owners of state obligation securities (bonds,

notes, etc.) find that the value of their holdings are reduced as the

“true” value of a unit of the domestic money is reduced by inflation.

So they are as if taxed on their holdings. And on the other hand, if

the state has established a form of “capital gains tax” then the effect

of inflation is to add an amount to whatever would be calculated as

the “capital gain” on property held for a time and then sold. A nominal

gain can even be created by inflation where a “true value” measure

would have fairly determined a loss.

    Then these considerations make clear, for example, that if, say,

the state finances of Xland operated stably with a capital gains tax

and with stable “targeted inflation” of 2.5 % annually than that there

would be a loss of state revenues if the inflation rate were reduced

to zero. That is, there would be a loss that could be expected in the

area of the capital gains tax revenues.

    So we can see that for the government of a state, acting on its own

independently of other states, to rationally contemplate the evolution

of the inflation rate for its currency towards zero there are clearly

some very relevant considerations relating to tax revenue expectations.

 

 

                     Psychological Considerations

 

    A truly “Machiavellian” regime can rationally scheme to make the

citizenry of the state FEEL well served (at least for a relatively

short time period) independently of whatever might be most truly best

for them (as seen from an “Olympian” viewpoint). Here it can be noted

that if there is gradual inflation then there should tend to be more

and more “millionaires” as a fraction of the population. If instead

there were fewer and fewer of these then that might conceivably impact

negatively on the psychology of the citizenry.

    It is also notable that there has been an overall sense of always

increasing human per capita wealth, globally, as technological advances

continue to modify the nature of the global economy. But consider the

effect of measuring wealth purely in terms of square miles owned per

capita of the earth’s land surface. If each Hopi tribesman owns x by

this measure and each Navaho tribesman owns y by the measure then, with

global population steadily increasing, should they feel happy or sad?

    Perhaps humanity will REALLY arrive at increased wealth if we can

successfully colonize lands beyond Terra, like the surfaces of Mars,

the Moon, and some asteroids. (But of course we could not illogically

claim ALREADY to own the whole Solar System at least, so it is clear

that psychological alternatives enter here also with regard to the

issue of the “true” evaluation of per capita wealth.)

    Possibly the full psychological effect of human “ownership” of the

surface of Mars would not be realized until that area had been divided

into plots regarded as the private property of specific corporate or

personal owners!

Note:  The  level of biting sarcasm embodied in these closing remarks is…  astronomical!  In our Church, the Church of the Biting Dog, John Nash IS the top dog.  His bite can put a tooth into another person’s mind even before the speed of sound introduces them to the pleasant sound of his bark.  His thoughts are law.  His reality is disorder.  The mathematics of salvation originate directly from His mind!  As both waves and particles combined 

 


Lecture by John F. Nash Jr.

Ideal Money and Asymptotically Ideal Money 


The special commodity or medium that we call money has a long and interesting history. 

And since we are so dependent on our use of it and so much controlled and motivated by the 

wish to have more of it or not to lose what we have we may become irrational in thinking 

about it and fail to be able to reason about it like about a technology, such as radio, to be 

used more or less efficiently. 


So I wish to present the argument that various interests and groups, notably including 

“Keynesian” economists, have sold to the public a “quasi-doctrine” which teaches, in effect, 

that “less is more” or that (in other words) “bad money is better than good money”. Here we 

can remember the classic ancient economics saying called “Gresham’s law” which was “The 

bad money drives out the good”. The saying of Gresham’s is mostly of interest here because 

it illustrates the “old” or “classical” concept of “bad money” and this can be contrasted with 

more recent attitudes which have been very much influenced by the Keynesians and by the 

results of their influence on government policies since the 30s. 


Digression on the Philosophy of Money 


It seems to be relevant to the politics of state decisions that affect the character of 

currency systems promoted by states that there are typical popular attitudes in relation to 

money. Although money itself is merely an artifact of practical usefulness in human societies 

and/or civilizations, there are some traditional or popular views associating money with sin 

or immorality or unethical or unjust behavior. And such views can have the effect that an 

ideal of good money does not seem such a good cause as an ideal of a good public water 

supply. There is also, for example, the Islamic concept which has the effect of classing as 

“usury” any lending of money at interest. (Here we can wonder about what sort of inflation 

rates might have been typical for any ma jor varieties of money, such as Byzantine money, 

at the times actually contemporaneous with the Prophet Mohammed.) 


In general, money has been associated in popular views with moral or ethical faults, 

like greed, avarice, selfishness, and lack of charity. But on the other hand, the existence of 

money often makes it easy to make valuable donations of philanthropic sorts and the parties 

receiving such contributions tend to find it most helpful when the donations are received as 

money! 


But the New Testament story about “money changers” being driven from the Temple 

illustrates clearly the idea of putting the clearly mundane and possibly “unclean” utility of 

money at some distance from where that money would presumably continue to be received 

when used as a vehicle for donations. 


Economics has been called “the dismal science” and it is certainly an area of studies 

where “the mundane” is appropriately studied. 


And philosophically viewed, money exists only because humanity does not live under 

“Garden of Eden” conditions and there are specializations of labor functions. So we are 

always exchanging, mediated by money transfers, the differing fruits of our varied forms of 

labor.

 

Welfare Economics 


A related topic, which we can’t fully consider in a single lecture, is that of the consid- 

erations to be given by society and the national state to “social equity” and the general 

“economic welfare”. Here the key viewpoint is methodological, as we see it. HOW should 

society and the state authorities seek to improve economic welfare generally and what should 

be done at times of abnormal economic difficulties or “depression”? 


We can’t go into it all, but we feel that actions which are clearly understandable as 

designed for the purpose of achieving a “social welfare” result are best. And in particular, 

programs of unemployment compensation seem to be comparatively well structured so that 

they can operate in proportion to the need. 


Money, Utility, and Game Theory 


In the sort of game theory that is studied and applied by economists the concept of “util- 

ity” is very fundamental and essential. Von Neumann and Morgenstern give a notably good 

and thorough treatment of utility in their book (on game theory and economic behavior). 

The concept of utility (mathematical) does indeed predate the book of Von Neumann and 

Morgenstern. And for example, as a concept, mathematical utility can be traced back to a 

paper published in 1886 in Pisa by G. B. Antonelli. 


When one studies what are called “cooperative games”, which in economic terms include 

mergers and acquisitions or cartel formation, it is found to be appropriate and is standard 

to form two basic classifications: 


(1): Games with transferable utility. 

(and) 

(2): Games without transferable utility 

(or “NTU” games). 


In the world of practical realities it is money which typically causes the existence of 

a game of type (1) rather than of type (2); money is the “lubrication” which enables the 

efficient “transfer of utility”. And generally if games can be transformed from type (2) to 

type (1) there is a gain, on average, to all the players in terms of whatever might be expected 

to be the outcome. 


But this function of money in generally facilitating the transfer of utility would seem to 

be as well performed by the currency of Thailand as by that of Switzerland. Or the question 

can be asked “How do ‘good money’ and ‘bad money’ differ, if at all, for the valuable function 

of facilitating utility transfer?”. But if we consider contracts having a relatively long time 

axis then the difference can be seen clearly. 


Consider a society where the money in use is sub ject to a rapid and unpredictable rate 

of inflation so that money worth 100 now might be worth from 50 to 10 by a year from now. 

Who would want to lend money for the term of a year? 


In this context we can see how the “quality” of a money standard can strongly influence 

areas of the economy involving financing with longer-term credits. 


And also, if we view money as of importance in connection with transfers of utility, we 

can see that money itself is a sort of “utility”, using the word in another sense, comparable 

to supplies of water, electric energy or telecommunications. And then, if we think about it, 

we can consider the quality of money as comparable to the quality of some “public utility” 

like the supply of electric energy or of water. 


“Keynesians” 


The thinking of J. M. Keynes was actually multi- dimensional and consequently there 

are quite different varieties of persons at the present time who follow, in one way or another, 

some of the thinking of Keynes. And of course SOME of his thinking was scientifically 

accurate and thus not disputable. For example, an early book written by Keynes was the 

mathematical text “A Treatise on Probability”. 


The label “Keynesian” is convenient, but to be safe we should have a defined meaning 

for this as a party that can be criticized and contrasted with other parties. 


So let us define “Keynesian” to be descriptive of a “school of thought” that originated 

at the time of the devaluations of the pound and the dollar in the early 30’s of the 20th cen- 

tury. Then, more specifically, a “Keynesian” would favor the existence of a “manipulative” 

state establishment of central bank and treasury which would continuously seek to achieve 

“economic welfare” ob jectives with comparatively little regard for the long term reputation 

of the national currency and the associated effects of that on the reputation of financial 

enterprises domestic to the state. 


And indeed a very famous saying of Keynes was “…in the long run we will all be dead 

…”. 


Ideal Money as a Concept 


A paper has already been published on the topic of “Ideal Money” and with that title. 

That paper of ours was published in the Southern Economic Journal after a lecture had been 

given on that topic at the meeting of the Southern Economic Association in Tampa, Florida. 

So it is better now not to cover again in full the grounds of the ideas presented there and 

the specifics about how “ideal money” currencies could be arranged for by using linkage to 

an appropriate index of the prices of internationally traded commodities. (Note that gold 

and silver are EXAMPLES of internationally traded commodities.) 



In Transition to Optimal Standards 


Our view is that if it is viewed scientifically and rationally (which is psychologically 

difficult!) that money should have the function of a standard of measurement and thus that 

it should become comparable to the watt or the hour or a degree of temperature. And money, 

as an efficient practical means of transferring utility, naturally links directly with the game 

theoretic idea of “TU games” (games with transferable utility). 


(Of course it is well known that in general the psychological reaction of a human of this 

world in relation to alternative prospects involving his or her receipt of money, this with 

elements of uncertainty linked with probabilities, tends to be NON-LINEAR. And this has 

the effect that the human individuals utility for money is typically a non-linear function, as 

it were, of the prospective quantities of money to be possibly received.) 


It is so desirable in game theory to have transferable utility that that those using game- 

theoretic analyses go ahead and use the transferable utility concept although it might not 

be entirely fitting except for individual games of comparatively small weight played by large 

insurance companies. 


The paper called “Ideal Money” that was recently published in the Southern Economic 

Journal presented a possible conventional basis for money of “ideal” type. This variety of 

money would be intrinsically free of “inflationary decadence” similarly to how money would 

be free from that on a true “gold standard”, but the proposed basis for that was not the 

proposal of a linkage to gold. 


But it seems very likely that, although that scheme for arranging for a system of money 

with ideal qualities would work well, that, on the other hand, it would be politically difficult 

to arrive at the implementation of such a system. 


(One can observe, for comparison, the difficulties that are found in connection with issues 

of which national regions should or should not be included with the group making use of the 

new “euro” currency. For example, the Turks would like to become club members but the 

Scandinavians and the U.K. British are not convinced that they would be beneficiaries by 

inclusion.) 


The Confessional of Targeting 


It was the observation of a new “line” that has become popular with those responsible 

for “central banking” functions relating to national currencies that gave us the idea for the 

study of “asymptotically ideal” money. 


The idea seems paradoxical, but by speaking of “inflation targeting” these responsible 

officials are effectively CONFESSING that, notwithstanding how they formerly were speak- 

ing about the difficulties and problems of their functions, that it is indeed after all possible 

to control inflation by controlling the supply of money (as if by limiting the amount of 

individual “prints” that could be made of a work of art being produced as “prints”). 


This popularity of the line of “inflation targeting” seems to have started in New Zealand, 

which is the place, among the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, which had the 

most depreciated dollar. And we can note also that New Zealand was hardly a place where 

any crisis of poverty really forced them to not maintain the value of their dollar but rather 

just a place where “Keynesian” thinking was probably very influential. 


Our observation, based on thinking in terms of “the long term” rather than in terms of 

“short range expediency”, was simply that there is no ideal rate of inflation that should be 

selected and chosen as the target but rather that the ideal concept would necessarily be that 

of a zero rate for what is called inflation. 


But of course, also, central monetary authorities of a state cannot actually do anything of 

the form that can be called “inflation targeting” without having some means for measuring 

inflation. How would they do this? The means for measuring inflation that they would 

naturally use would be a “cost of living” index relating to domestic prices within the territory 

of the state. 


In the USA the standard domestic “cost of living” index has a long history and it actually 

originated back in the days when the USA was still on the “gold standard” with regard to the 

monetary standards being accepted then. And most states nowadays having large domestic 

economies also have some sort of an analogous index of prices. 


Currencies in Competition 


It is observable that certain types of financial enterprises, such as large internationally op- 

erating insurance companies, tend to migrate to national homes where the national currency 

is of at least comparatively higher quality (such as, e. g., Switzerland). 


In the near future there may be a smaller number of ma jor currencies used in the world 

and these may stand in competitive relations among themselves. There is now the “euro” 

and the old inflationary history of the Italian lira is past history now. And there COULD be 

introduced, for example, a similar international currency for the Islamic world or for South 

Asia, or for South America, or here or there. 


And if “inflation targeting” were used as a “line” by the managers handling all of these 

various internationally prominent currencies then there would arise interesting possibilities 

for comparisons between these ma jor currencies. Each of the currencies managed thusly 

would have its officially recognized status in terms of inflation as measured by the domestic 

index of costs of the state of the managers. But also, and this is what is more significant from 

an internationally oriented viewpoint, the various currencies would have rates of exchange 

so that they could be realistically compared in terms of their actual values. 


And so the various currencies managed with “inflation targeting” would be comparable 

by users or observers who would be able to form opinions about the quality of the currencies. 

 

And what I want to suggest is that “the public” or the users, those for whom a medium of 

exchange functions as a basic utility, may develop opinions that are critical of currencies of lower “value quality”. That is, the public may learn to demand better quality of that which 

CAN be managed to be of better quality or which can be managed to be of the lower quality 

observed in so many of the various national currencies in the 20th century. 


So here is the possibility of “asymptotically ideal money”. Starting with the idea of 

value stabilization in relation to a domestic price index associated with the territory of one 

state, beyond that there is the natural and logical concept of internationally based value 

comparisons. The currencies being compared, like now the euro, the dollar, the yen, the 

pound, the swiss franc, the swedish kronor, etc. can be viewed with critical eyes by their 

users and by those who may have the option of whether or not or how to use one of them. 

This can lead to pressure for good quality and consequently for a lessened rate of inflationary 

depreciation in value. 


Illustrating the principle of these optional choices, the people of Sweden recently had the 

opportunity of voting in a referendum on whether or not Sweden should join the eurocurrency 

bloc and replace the kronor by the euro and thus use the same currency as Finland. The 

people voted against that, for various reasons. But it cannot be irrelevant whether or not 

the future quality of a currency is really assured or whether instead that it depends on the 

shifting sands of political decisions or the possibly arbitrary actions of a bureaucracy of 

officials. 


The voters in the U.K. are expecting to have the opportunity to vote in a referendum 

relating to the adoption, for the U.K., of the euro (which is already adopted in Ireland). 

Here they have a dramatic conflict, since the pound was the original currency of “the gold 

standard”, with its value pegged to gold in 1717 by Isaac Newton who was then Master 

of the Mint. (Of course it was not irrelevant that George II, the king then, was an early 

Hanoverian and also ruled territories in Germany.) 


In recent years the pound has had a comparatively good rating with regard to inflation, 

inferior to the rating of the swiss franc but superior to most currencies of the world. So the 

British have the alternatives of accepting adoption of the euro when first voting, or after a 

delay, or never. 


We can legitimately wonder how the speediness of its adoption or delays in its adoption 

might affect the policies operating to control the actual exchange value of the euro. The 

constitutional structure of the authority behind the euro is of the “paper money” character 

in that nothing is really guaranteed as far as the value of the euro is concerned. But this is 

typical of all currencies used in the world nowadays. 


Of course when a currency, for a time, does have a specification of its value beyond the 

local fiat of administrators in its national home, like the money of Argentina had a peg to the 

U.S. dollar a few years ago, then international observers can wisely distrust the reliability of 

such a stabilization of its value. Such forms of value definition are not necessarily unsound, 

particularly when a small economy, like that of Panama, links its currency to that of a larger 

area like that of the USA. But it is obvious that this sort of thing puts a burden on the 

foundation of the currency that is used as a reference basis. 

 

For example, if all sorts of non-European countries decided to define the values of their 

currencies as on a par with the euro, without actually joining into any system of cooperative 

regulations associated with that, then the effect of that would seem likely to destabilize the 

stability of the euro if it would otherwise be highly stable and of good value quality. 

 

Political Evolution 


There perhaps will always be “politics”, like also “death and taxes”. But it is sometimes 

remarkable how political contexts can evolve. And in relation to that I think that it is 

possible that “the Keynesians” are like a political faction that will become less influential as 

a result of political evolution. The “Keynesian” view of things did not come into existence 

until after the time when what we can call “Bolshevik communism” had become established 

in Russia. And by this label we wish to differentiate between any theoretical or ideal concept 

of communism and the actual form of governing regime structure that came to exercise state 

power in Moscow. (All over the world varieties of states make claims to have governments 

very properly or even ideally devoted to the interests of the citizens or nationals of those 

states and always an externally located critic can argue that the government is actually a 

sort of despotism.) 


The Keynesians implicitly always have the argument that some good managers can do 

things of beneficial value, operating with the treasury and the central bank, and that it is 

not needed or appropriate for the citizenry or the “customers” of the currency supplied by 

the state to actually understand, while the managers are managing, what exactly they are 

doing and how it will affect the “pocketbook” circumstances of these customers. 


I see this as analogous to how the “Bolshevik communists” were claiming to provide 

something much better than the “bourgeois democracy” that they could not deny existed in 

some other countries. But in the end the “dictatorship of the proletariat” seemed to become 

rather exposed as simply the dictatorship of the regime. So there may be an analogy to this 

as regards those called “the Keynesians” in that while they have claimed to be operating for 

high and noble ob jectives of general welfare what is clearly true is that they have made it 

easier for governments to “print money”. 


So I see the Keynesians as in a weak sense comparable to the “Bolsheviks” because of 

the support of both parties for a certain “lack of transparency” relating to the functions of 

government as seen by the citizenry. And for both of them it can be said that they tend to 

think in terms of government agencies operating in a benevolent fashion that is, however, 

beyond the comprehension of the citizens of the state. And this parallel makes it seem 

not implausible that a process of political evolution might lead to the expectation on the 

part of citizens in the “great democracies” that they should be better situated to be able 

to understand whatever will be the monetary policies which, indeed, are typically of great 

importance to citizens who may have alternative options for where to place their “savings”. 



///////////////////////////////////////////////////// 

Opening for Questions or Debate 

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 


(The talk text, just for the “ideal money” topic, originally derives from my outline for the 

lectures given at various specific locations of the “European School of Economics” in Italy 

during October 1997. Subsequent to that time, after consulting with some of the economics 

faculty at Princeton, I learned of the work and publications of Friedrich von Hayek. I must 

say that my thinking is apparently quite parallel to his thinking in relation to money and 

particularly with regard to the non-typical viewpoint in relation to the functions of the 

authorities which in recent times have been the sources of currencies (earlier “coinage”).) 

(There were some later revisions and expansions of the text on “Ideal Money” and I 

subsequently also spoke on this topic at Northwestern, at Yale, in Athens, Greece, at a 

meeting in Tampa, Florida, at Peking University in Beijing, China and at a meeting in 

Mumbai, India. And then my lecture at the Tampa meeting was published in the SEJ 

journal.) 


(And the portion specifically concerned with “asymptotically ideal” currencies was added 

first for a talk at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.) 

Amerikaner Bank

The Amerikaner Bank we have set up originated with the ideas in the text below (subtitled “a better life”) dating from around 2 years ago.  The actual bank – different to the one imagined then – is trading in the Rand as a currency convertible back into gold via the site goldmoney.  Our Rands (unlike the promise to pay of California’s IOU’s!) are backed up by the exchange rate between the Rand and gold on the day of each transaction.  Maybe… over some time:  all Rands will be thus backed up.   As of now:  Amba is placing rands into circulation via its selected clients only.

 

 

a better life

NB  The Amerikaaner Bank is being set up in Kingston to moderate a new balance between the economies of the RSA and the USA from Jamaica, via Ireland…

 

This e-mail was originally sent to our Minister of Trade and Industry, in connection with the Edcon merger.  Since then I realized it’s up to me as a private citizen to implement this vision.  The govt has its hands full.  So I am doing it!   For now though, this is just a text to read in conjunction with the e-mail to GATA…

 

You have to crawl before you can walk, or fly.  And as Mick Jagger said:  “you make a dead man crawl!!!”

 

 

 

….When Apartheid was finally over and our new Government had a chance to try and run the country in the very best way, for all citizens, it shared the vision of “a better life for all”.  Then it set out to achieve this vision on a sound economic basis.  Attracting foreign investors was set up as a key objective to create a sound, post-sanctions, economy.  SA decided to compete for foreign investments effectively by setting up a free market economy.  Something extra our country offers investors who own GOLD could gives us a winning edge; even though other emerging marketplaces offer investors free market economies too.

 

Let’s seize the initiative and use our potential advantage for the good of all.  Not in the narrow sense where the entire global economy necessarily benefits in the short term.  Mzansi will benefit the most, and soonest, yet in so doing we shall – looking at the big picture – nudge our Planet towards a better BALANCE:  over the longer term.  This is something we also have to do since there is no other country with our knowledge of what Nkulunkulu expects from His children:  in these times.

 

New developments have occurred in the global economy since apartheid ended.  Our country is no longer going about attracting foreign investment in the very best way because; it hasn’t responded to them…  yet.  Neither has anyone else!  With our approach though:  the Edcon merger will become a giant step in the direction of obtaining foreign investment on much more favorable terms, than in the recent past. 

 

BRIEF RECAP with commentaries

 

When the Cold War ended in 1989, five years before apartheid did, South Africa had been seen as a geographical territory of key importance by both sides owing to its reserves of precious metals, including gold, uranium, and platinum.  The Western Powers then adopted a different approach to ensure the supply of these products to them by South Africa would continue on favorable terms.  They pretended they no longer have a racial bias, made out they had been unequivocal supporters of the ANC from day one, and postured as advanced, more civilized, trendsetting big brothers whom had already been through a similar struggle for liberation and emancipation “long ago”.  This was supportive!  It is a stance we should hold them to.  Yet we should not either deny to ourselves the reality we are setting a new trend as has never been done before, ever:  on Earth.  We are not behind trying to “catch up”.  We’re frontrunners!

 

If we look at how racial minorities, including Africans, are treated in these “developed” countries by the majority of voters (e.g. the recent elections in France) and consider the actual history, it’s obvious there is still powerful undercurrent resentment towards African people in some other nations that expresses itself as unjustified reservations and doubts over whether we have what it takes to develop our own powerful economies.  To date this has put us in the position (their POV) where we are still only TRYING to prove we can “keep up with them” and the jury is still out. 

 

Or stated differently:  the debate over whether Africa is impoverished because it was colonized (and plundered) or, colonizing Africa was a necessary first step to ending its impoverishment, has blurred the real issue.  Which is:  we have been plundered:  emotionally, even more than our natural resources have been ripped off.  We can recover much faster, and better – emotionally – if we take back what belongs to us.  Their economies DID get where they are today BY using power we gave up to them.

 

Yes we CAN take it back now.  No, we don’t need their consent:  thank God!!!

 

When apartheid ended the underlying quid pro quo between South Africa and the Western Powers became:  they would provide expertise, help, and support (in how to set up an open society and a free market economy) that amounted to a kind of insurance to protect the new Government – consisting principally of Africans, elected democratically by other Africans – from the kind of failure that could occur if the mlungu population wanted to destabilize the country, because:  we (I am also an mlungu!) might see ourselves as the losers in this new arrangement. 

 

If this was the quid, the quo was that the ANC undertook not to nationalize the mining industry, and continue supplying the developed nations:  as always.  Inasmuch as this was only a switch to carrots, from sticks:  it was essentially no change.  Let’s be clear on this.  The change to a post-Apartheid reality was huge:  and the African people achieved it collectively, using our strength of will.  What never really changed was:  the rest of the world’s expectation it could continue paying colonial “free market” prices for our raw materials.

 

And the reason?  It’s something like:  the existence of precious minerals under the earth in our country is some kind of random meaningless geological accident.  We were too stupid to know how to mine them until mlungu came to show us how.  All we can do now IS mine them.  We lack their ability to process these materials into useful products like…  platinum catalysts for emission controls, and…  atomic bombs, etc.  So we must just export the raw materials:  for them to use and profit from.  Until ONEDAY we too have an advanced industrial economy that pollutes the environment, which lowers the quality of life for the masses, increases alienation, and generally creates a high tech trash society.

 

A deep and complicated spell was actually thrown over the ANC leadership.  Although we hesitated to call a spade a spade before deciding to go ahead and use this accurate but perhaps controversial terminology, we have decided those who were beaten by this muti must thank us for removing its effects instead of blaming us – since we are also from the same mlungu tribe – for helping to use this muti to beat them. 

 

Maybe we let this spell take hold for a short time:  to give the African people an opportunity to realize they must differentiate between mlungu like us, and those others, and; to give ourselves a chance to understand our African brothers and sisters, better.  Maybe this whole story has been long, and very complex…  But read this if you do want the spell to wear off.

 

Thanks anyway to this quid pro quo, foreign investors have invested in our stock market, bought property, and other assets; tourism has increased and created more jobs…  and we have gone ahead with building houses, educating our children, improving the nation’s nutrition, and installing electricity, water, roads, and telecommunication services where these were not available before.  Our general impression of the immigration story that has unfolded during this time (we haven’t checked our facts, yet) is that:  few mlungu have immigrated, more than a few have emigrated, many new visitors and immigrants have arrived from Zimbabwe, Malawi, Nigeria; and many other places.

 

This progress, though excellent, simply hasn’t been enough in that:  the people are still suffering too much and want to elect JZ as a populist president even IF he had unprotected sex and has been charged with corruption!  Given how patient the people have already been, I can’t blame them, yet the ANC isn’t at fault either for it seems to have done its level best within its (financial) means. 

 

We are entering a scary period of uncertainty where (instead of helping) the G8 could use a divide and conquer strategy to undermine us while pontificating to us we are having the learning experience with democracy that is part of “growing up”.  They use the tactic of denying needed help and support to thus set up others to fail, they do.  It is pointless to complain though.  Mzansi must awaken and SHIFT.  For the past eight years (especially) the USA has been creating prosperity for its citizens merely by printing more money!  We can find better ways to create prosperity for our citizens and thus defeat the divide and conquer strategy. 

 

The Government and People of South Africa of all races were ripped off by the quid pro quo over strategic metals.  These Western Powers are not on the side of the new Government nor of the African population, they have only been pretending to be.  They conned us into forgetting how important our “strategic reserves” of raw materials had been during the Cold War.  Speaking metaphorically, they teamed up with the big companies that operated our mines all during apartheid and removed Anglo American, Billiton and De Beers from South Africa and listed them on the London Stock Exchange, with satisfaction. 

 

Speaking for just ourselves, personally, Peta, Zane and me, of the Press Family, are not disheartened, perplexed, or dismayed because of what has happened because we know (and therefore understand) the people whom have done this.  We can outsmart them any day of the week!  Our fellow South Africans have achieved enormous gains over the past thirteen years, principally in self-esteem.  Now without any further summation of recent history we present our proposal of a BETTER way to obtain foreign investment on MORE FAVORABLE terms, for Mzansi. 

 

Of course it is based on the importance of our strategic reserves.  Why should it not be?  The name our strategy is called by is “turning the tables”.  It is an accepted practice throughout the world.  The only criterion necessary for carrying it out is being able to.  The other parties then accept the outcome as if they have been expecting it.  The unmentioned possibility has existed all along to their knowledge.  Or we wouldn’t even be able to do it.  The generic name for such spells is “intimidation”.  Intimidation works best when the party being subdued is unaware of it.

 

They know how important our strategic raw materials are.  The measure of how well they know it is how careful they have been to avoid it as a topic of negotiation or even discussion and debate.  With “ample forethought” they have ensured (or, they thought and hoped they had ensured) this topic was carefully and properly wrapped up in the concepts of democracy, free trade, the family of nations, and so forth.

 

NOTE

 

Please don’t think you have already heard all you need to know!  Pay attention and learn how to move things around while keeping them wrapped up just as they are!  There is no need to change this thing into an either/or situation, nor to throw away one advantage in order to gain another.  Mzansi did already grow up; quicker than they thought we ever would.  We are out ahead already; let’s stay ahead.  Their problems are not our problems and their problems are self-created (by themselves:  this repetition of the obvious is being done for deliberate EMPHASIS.)  They have more problems than we do!  They are exploiting US to fix their SELFISHLY CREATED problems while reversing this syndrome and posturing as if Africa has huge problems it needs the West – and East – to help us solve.  Oh really!!

 

When it came to the crunch they decided not to help us with our problems, and they know this.  We have buried our hard feelings; let’s keep them buried.  Now we won’t help them with their problems either (which we didn’t cause, anyway:  they can’t say the same about ours) and so let’s just win in our own country on our own terms and even stay friends with those whom have only been pretending to be our friends.

 

AMBA

 

We are applying to the Competition Tribunal, and to the Government generally, via the Reserve Bank, for permission to set up the Amerikaaner Bank:  Amba, for short.  [Note:  these ideas for Amba have NOT been thought through yet!]

 

Amba will create a cartel.  It will make the needed raw materials we supply to the rest of the world very scarce.  I suppose their price will go up.  Then, let’s face it; the Western Powers can retaliate by selling the rand short.  This is the sort of “serious approach to business” and solving the real problems of the world going on today.  Paper money could have worked.  But it has turned into a big joke.  Selling the rand short because those doing it make huge paper profits (since they know when to cover) is a sick joke.  The rand will always go back up because we are working hard to make our small economy prosper.  Meanwhile our import/export traders get thrown for a loop.  Very funny!  Now Amba will sort this out, as a favor to everyone.

 

To do this Amba needs, and will in due course request:  the right of first refusal to purchase certain of our raw materials, and, the authority to purchase controlling percentages of the equity in companies listed on the JSE, without paying a premium.  Let’s make Amba Mzansi’s answer to the Federal Reserve Bank in the USA.  If the Fed were regulating the US economy as it claims it does – by adjusting interest rates – sagely responding to accurate measurements of the US economy… that would be ok…  IF:  the USA were minding its own business and buying only its fair share of what our Earth has to offer.  Instead the Fed is adjusting interest rates AND printing money AND using the money it prints to manipulate the key economic indicators it uses to adjust the interest rates AND:  doing all this in the way that will cause the US stock exchanges to go up.

 

They pretend the increase in the value of the stock traded on these exchanges is caused by so many citizens adding value to their economy, but this is not so.  A LOT of the increase is due to more money being printed.

 

Amba will borrow money from South Africa’s banks and use it to purchase the stated locally produced raw materials, which will thus be unavailable to the world economy because Amba will stockpile them:  that’s what makes Amba a bank.  These raw materials will be deposited in it.  Amba’s ability to pay the interest on the money it borrows will depend in part on the increase in value of these raw materials as they become scarcer. 

 

Amba will ALSO borrow money against the value of these raw materials and use it to purchase shares in mature long established companies listed on the JSE.  These companies are going to be seen, or treated, more as utilities than as entrepreneurial organizations.  They each provide goods and services to the economy, and they each have their market share.

 

Amba is going to purchase between 52 and 100 percent of their equity and swap it for raw materials of equivalent value.  If these companies didn’t like this they could de-list off the JSE but they are not going to do this, because:  it is going to be a big bonanza for them to replace their equity with precious metals that go up in value because, Amba is creating scarcity in the marketplaces (without actually being a cartel.)

 

By means of its swapping process Amba will start attracting foreign investment in the very best way:  by rewarding investors in gold bullion (and other precious metals) – who happen to also be foreigners.

 

Amba will accept deposits of gold owned by foreign investors and use these as collateral for loans from commercial banks to purchase the equity in major companies listed on the JSE.  This is how the tables get turned.  These are the foreign investors we really need.  Anything else amounts to selling off parts of OUR country TO foreign investors!  This is madness if you factor in (as most people usually don’t) these foreign investors are using wealth they or their ancestors obtained from colonies:  to purchase parts and pieces of what belongs to us.

 

All hope that these colonizers would voluntarily give back all or even some of what they took disappeared after the UN Conference on Human Rights in Durban which was followed, interestingly, right afterwards by 9/11.  It’s almost as if God actually knows what He is doing these days (when He let that happen) because:  9/11 became the excuse for the United States to go on a massive spending spree in order to wage war.  They spent more than they could afford to, and put a lot of money into circulation to do this.  They did this by selling Treasury Bills; the Chinese Government purchased a lot of them.

 

Loose ends…

 

 

The way the tables actually get turned is:  Amba will obtain the loans from the commercial banks first, and then purchase equity in companies on the JSE.  When foreign investors deposit gold in Amba the foreign investors will pay the loans from the commercial banks back by borrowing against their deposits in Amba on the strength of an agreement between them and Amba that makes the equity owned by Amba the collateral for these loans. 

 

This is simple.  The agreement states:  every deposit of bullion in Amba will be secured by its portfolio of equities and the depositor will receive a certificate stating the value of the equities which secure his or her investment.  Any depositor of bullion can then go to any commercial bank and say:  I wish to borrow money against the value of this certificate issued by Amba.

 

Then:  if the value of the equities owned by Amba ever goes down in value the banks whom have loaned money to the owners of the gold bullion can repossess their collateral which is these equities.  But they have no claim over the gold bullion that the investors in Amba have deposited.  Amba will sell off some equity and pay it out to the banks claiming this collateral.  So far as these banks are concerned these bullion owners invested in unit trusts.  So far as the investors are concerned: they deposited their gold in Amba and borrowed money to invest in a unit trust at the same time.

 

A new quid pro quo.  The bullion and the equity are… paired.  Their respective value buttresses each other.  Think of it as all that gold that was stolen from Mzansi during the colonial and apartheid days…  some of it ended up in the hands of “goldbugs” in the USA, and elsewhere.  THEY are the natural allies of the RSA.  They are the foreign investors we need.  And how can the USA accuse us of any wrong when THEIR OWN CITIZENS exercise their democratic and capitalistic rights to invest here to our specifications BECAUSE WE WILL CREATE THE DEMAND FOR (and/or SHORTAGE OF) GOLD BULLION THAT CAUSES THEIR HOLDINGS TO GO UP IN VALUE.

 

OK Mandisi, and friends:  the above only REALLY makes sense when you have received the viewpoint of GATA, the Gold Anti Trust Action committee.  This can be picked up at the James Joyce table of www.lemetropolecafe.com

 

A brief extract to point you in the right direction is: 

 

…this guy Ashley wanted to know how exactly the argument goes that claims the price of gold has been manipulated to prevent gold from serving as a barometer that sends the signal to investors (like it used to) when inflation is going up. 

 

According to these guys inflation IS going up in the USA much more than the official government measurements of it BUT they keep printing more money so the stock market goes up anyway…  creating the APPEARANCE of a strong economy.

 

They wrote back:

 

Hello Ashley, 
 

The basics are simple.  The annual supply/demand deficit is running between 1,000 and 1500 tonnes per year  … meaning The Gold Cartel AND central banks must supply (above mine and scrap supply) that amount of gold into the market place to meet demand. 

Around 10 years ago, the supply of gold in the central banks was supposed to be 31,000 tonnes, at MOST.  Thus 10,000 to 15,000 tonnes of gold is now GONE, leaving 21,000 to 16,000 tonnes left to suppress the price.

It must be kept in mind that a number of central banks WILL NOT part with their gold, which means only a portion of the gold that is left is available for dumping.  Most of the foolish central bankers that have sold gold found it to be a substantial loser, as the years have gone by.  [The price went up after they sold it.]

Wait until gold makes decade highs and takes out $2,000 per ounce. There will be an outcry how the bankers could have squandered gold in such reckless fashion!  Meanwhile, mine supply is on the wane, while gold demand is on the rise; especially in China and India.

Thus, as world financial market conditions deteriorate, The Gold Cartel is headed into a time when they will be overwhelmed by this surging demand and be forced to defend a MUCH higher gold price level, so that it won’t take as much of their gradually dwindling ammo to keep the price from going bonkers.

Hope this helps.

Bill Murphy

This means:  when the price of gold goes up and the USA no longer owns much gold AND the service jobs in their economy are not really adding value (but just using up all the extra money they have been printing) they will have to print more and more money to buy things with:  the dollar will be worth less and less.

Another guy then wrote:

In regards to Ashley’s question; how can the Central Banks ever run out of gold, when they can repurchase what they sold at lower prices?  There are two different, but inter-related markets:  physical bullion and futures contracts (paper). 



The CBs can’t repurchase the bullion they have surreptitiously disposed of because there is a deficit in physical gold supply.   The price of bullion would immediately regain the ground it just lost.  There is no surplus of bullion that can be acquired without forcing prices up. 

 

The paper markets are a different story.  Here the Central Banks’ henchmen, the bullion banks, can buy or sell at will because there is no effective limit on the numbers of contracts that can be traded.  When prices drop, the Cartel players/commercials can absorb the selling at lower levels and make a profit without disturbing the price of gold; that is why the open interest usually falls on these downward moves.

HOWEVER, this is only a paper profit, payable only in paper money. If the profiteers ever tried to move their loot out of paper and into physical gold, the gold price would jump because of the deficit in physical gold supply.  So the profits come with a sort of curse; they are doomed to remain in the paper realm and share the fate of that money form. 



Paper trades may set the current market price of gold, but only so long as enough real bullion can be funneled into the retail channel to satisfy demand.  The day the banks run out of physical is the day the paper markets go poof!  


Best wishes,

Peter R.

 

The “developed nations” intimidated poor little South Africa forcing the leaders of this hapless country (who endured decades of misery and domination long after the rest of the world had beaten the Nazis!) to PROVE they know how to run a country in order to show they are worthy to join the… club (of “civilised” industrial nations.)

“The people” have all co-operated with the Government just out of gratitude to their leaders for ending apartheid, to show solidarity, and for lack of any alternative.  The word on the street though is that we accept ourselves and like our country – for the most part – just as it is.  We don’t WANT to become “like them.”  We just want to be who we are!  The people want to get out of poverty, and want decent lifestyles with proper housing, and access to medical care.  If the measure of civillization is how sensitive, subtle, and complex people are on the inside:  Africa is already a highly civilised continent!

South Africa can stop exporting its precious minerals.  It can afford to.  It has them.  They are assets.  They exist in the ground here just like the shares in their trust funds exist for the children born into South Africa’s wealthy families:  just because they are born.  The concept that the RSA has to export its natural resources in order to bring in the foreign exchange and foreign investors it needs so it can “develop” is false.

The concept that a weaker rand strengthens the economy and creates jobs (by making exports cheaper) is false also!

The main problem is guilt.  The African people just don’t have the nerve – yet! – to take the steps that will pull our natural resources off the world market and cause the value of the Dollar to go south.  On the lemetropolecafe site the “gold cartel” they keep talking about is a paper gold cartel.  South Africa could create a gold bullion cartel and it should:  this will be equivalent to obtaining payment of reparations for apartheid.

With a stronger – much stronger! – rand the people of South Africa will be able to buy what we need to repair and restore all the damage that’s been caused to us.  We can develop more of a service economy here while the citizens in the USA – with a weaker dollar – can get on with recovering and regaining the traits that once made America great.  Traits South Africans already developed:  during Apartheid.

We’ll tell you the story of how our own personal experiences developed our capacity to recognise how SA has been getting blindsided by the USA, some other time (if you want to know.)  How many South Africans have put it together, yet, that the gold price is manipulated?  Or:  how this impacts us?

Sincerely,

Peta and Gregor Press

 

Note:  In the extract above in this same color font the implication is:  we would need your collaboration and support.  Yes, it is possible; no:  it won’t be a piece of cake!

The Reader crumples guilt, life just gets sweeter!

If you have felt cold and alone, owing to guilt, it will have been:  for nothing!  

The Reader…  hurtles out of its dark shadow to blind side one of the most vicious guilt reflections ever to devastate our precious globe.  Scene one:  a professional man – lawyer – and the woman who spent the night at his house.  A Family Man opened the same way.

21 grams…  also took on the shadow of guilt.  That was then:  this is now!  Sccne two:  ”the kid” is sick, a woman helps him.

Parting shot, as the film ends:  ”When I was a boy…  a woman helped me.”  It ends where it began in this sense and also back (to the future) in 1998:  the same year as the opening scene.

Same thing with The Hours:  Virginia Wolf is killing herself when it starts and still walking into the river at the ending.    

With the critical difference in this film:  there is a way out – of the hell, which guilt is – for the daughter.

Please get the message:  the Holocaust wasn’t a living hell, it was slaughter.  Slaughter is hell.  Yet these6 million deaths weren’t meaningless.  The redemption/creation of Israel began:  in these crematoria.  The six million did die for something!  Real guilt continues to take down and destroy the lives of millions of people, daily.  Turning our hair grey.

Aging us prematurely.

“Getting and spending we lay waste the hours…”

To survive:  we have quit generating more guilt about the Holocaust, which is over:  for nothing.  We have also shut down the guilt that turns days into nothing or nothingness. 

Reader!

 


The Reader, take six

In the penultimate scene Michael visits the daughter/author/holocaust survivor in her beautifully decorated, tasteful, classy Manhattan apartment we can’t help realizing she can afford thanks to the income from her book selling well because she lived to tell the tale of her ordeal.

She needs these aesthetic surroundings and the security of wealth to make her feel protected and safe.  It’s 1995:  she’s had half a century to reprocess the scintillating identity we now realize emerged in ‘the camps” and must have been a huge factor in helping her survive.

She’s no ordinary woman.  She’s the living embodiment of moral outrage directed with calculated self-assured precision Jewish women use to assert their precious dignity.  Irrespective of how things might be going with the man or non-existent man in their life.  At least they have this moral altitude, no Rabbi would ever dare try to deny.

Have I set the scene…  rightly?

Her and Michael have a fencing match with their wits in which he is the stand in for Hanna who has hanged herself.  Before she did this she learned to write.  After she did this she wrote her suicide note / will.  Though Hanna has already one this fencing match before it even starts, Michael doesn’t quite know this.

Then the Holocaust survivor – exquisitely played by Lena Olin – says:  ”there must be, there’s a Jewish organization for everything.”  This is where our film begins!  

I won’t presume to call it a sequel per se.  I mean this in the sense:  Miami Vice picks up where Collateral ends, and The Reader  continues from where The Hours left off.  The Departed continues in Boston from the Gangs of New York in Manhattan…  and so on.  Proof of Life becomes State of Play…  Zak and Mimi make a porno is a remake of Jersey Girl… don’t get me started!

“There’s a Jewish organization for everything.”  Oh yeah.  There most certainly is.

In our film this fictionalized Jewish organization which in reality is called Jewish Community Services carries on its good work from offices in Sandringham, a suburb of Johannesburg.  It’s a social work agency funded by the largesse of Donald Gordon whom we’ll rename Hymie Cohen in the film.  He’s made a mint out of life insurance, and…  developing shopping centers in Britain.

JCS…  provide counseling and support to Jewish women abused by their husbands, they rehabilitate drug addicts, they…  find jobs for the unemployed and mend families when there’s a divorce or bereavement.  Good works are there aim.  Doing good is their theme!  When a child in the community is in need of foster parents they won’t let this child go without the love and warmth they proudly consider a birthright for Jewish children especially.

The Reader, first take

Via Steven Daldry, the same British film director who gave us The Hours, Hollywood shows Germany as it was in 1958 for the first time ever…  I think the way of life and tone of existence in this humbled and defeated nation is more appealing than the equivalent in any other post war European nation or any state of America recreated by Hollywood for the same era. 

We see a 15 year old boy, his family, and schoolmates in the days before the influence of Adolf Hitler had completely worn off yet, and then, a few years later, he’s in law school just after rock and roll has taken off.

While rebuilding is happening constantly in the background, this Germany is different than it was in 1932.  Even though it was defeated Germany gained much more in WW2 than it lost, because – on balance – it fought very hard and selflessly, in deadly earnest for new values it felt passionate about, to then fall back on older, deeper values it cherished even more.  The cruelty epitomized by the Nazis is now gone just as surely as the Jews who fled or perished.

Put it this way:  this defeated Germany is still miles ahead of where it was after WW1, which ended fourty years before. 

Hgggkmm  Ughhmmmm Ghah! Im UmmmMMM!  This is the sound of me clearing my throat like Phillip Seymour Hoffman in one of the closeout scenes at the end of Along Came Polly.

Except maybe for the South after the Civil War the USA has never grown so much, and so fast, emotionally: in any four decades.  Then during Vietnam when the USA could have taken a great leap forward (if – hypothetically – JFK had not been assassinated) it blew its opportunity to shine as brightly as Germany did.

Michael in his youth (played by David Kross) is fortunate to be seduced by Hanna (Kate Winslett) that same hot chick we saw in Titanic.  Now DiCaprio and her have teamed up again to star in Revolution Road.  No:  this isn’t a film review!  I can say whatever I want about anything or any one I want to.  At any time.  

But anyway…  in Prime we saw a different three actors playing out a version of the same thing in Manhattan PD (present day.)  A very handsome Jewish youth fucking a stunningly handsome Nordic Aryan blonde divorcee, in her late thirties, played by Uma Thurman right after she’s starred in Kill Bill:  twice.  With Meryl Streep as his very Jewish mom:  also her (UT’s) psychoanalyst…

This tells us there is progress!  The thick layer or blanket of guilt that infested life right after WW2, that rock and roll started to blow off, has been lifted off exposing a very dangerous, quite disgusting, prickly situation to our unjaundiced view.  

The three actors in The Reader btw include Joseph Fiennes playing Michael after he has grown up.  Thus:  two men and one woman where Prime was two woman and one very lucky young man.

This is how we do it here.  We find meaning in patterns as well as ‘everything else’.  So take a look at Tadpole, Prime.  Crush.  Something’s Gotta Give, Tadpole, I could never be your woman, and of course Notes on a Scandal.

This is it.  We don’t take too much for the first take.  

It’s not always enough to read:  sometimes we have to take notes!

 


Duplicity

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we set out to deceive, but then, as we get better at it, we become quite successful!  All we need is:  special FX, CGS, camera angles, stunt men, stunt doubles, a publicist, a filter on the lens, scripts honed by response researchers to help us give the public what it wants, teams of lawyers, and casting agents who make and break careers.  Thus We created Hollywood replete with the movie moguls whom are sub-texted here as two leaders of competing monolithic consumer product corps.  

Then it turns out poor little Julia Roberts and Clive Owen are like… the typical actor and actress played by these studio bosses who wind up with most of the winnings while the exploited thespians are stuck with a lifestyle they are hooked on but can barely afford.  Unless they keep acting out the roles assigned to them.  

And so it is…  we got into the State of Play we’re in today where these movie moguls who set out to make a profit wound up creating films that are prophetic inadvertently. 

If there is no way the actors and actresses can ever take over the business, well:  maybe this is what Tropic of Thunder was about.  If in playing a film producer Tom Cruise inadvertently played himself.

“Actor, actor, sitting on a tractor, down went Valkyrie, down went Cruise!”

After years of observing her environment Julia Roberts figured out that if she as a creative person can’t change the way things are she can at least choose who profits at her expense.  The lesser of two evils; the greater of two fools:  we take our pic.  Pun intended.

Since actors and actresses are meant to play their roles this has been giving them the excuse  for decades to say:  ”well I’m just me.  Who you see up there on the screen is just a product I created:  doing what they told me to.”  Right, I see: the future’s not everything it was cracked up to be, either.

Therefore the next film we need after Proof of Life, State of Play, Deception, and Duplicity is…

Stalled for Time.